Noah is studying dogs to determine their interest in blue toys versus red toys. He splits a group of 20 dogs into 2 groups. One group is given blue toys and the other is given red toys. Noah has the dogs play with the toys until they lose interest. He finds that the dogs that had blue toys played with them 2 minutes longer than the dogs that played with red toys. Noah rerandomizes the data, calculates the difference between the means, and creates the dot plot shown below. Based on the data, can Noah conclude the difference is significant?
Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
No, Noah cannot conclude the difference is significant because a 2-minute difference is likely to happen by chance.
Yes, Noah can conclude the difference is significant because a 2-minute difference is not likely to happen by chance.
Yes, Noah can conclude the difference is significant because 0.25 is the difference in means that occurs most often.
No, Noah cannot conclude the difference is significant because 0.25 is the difference in means that occurs most often.