anonymous
  • anonymous
Is this the structure of SOCl2 ?
Chemistry
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1439680893239:dw|
Vocaloid
  • Vocaloid
let's walk through it step by step |dw:1439682015489:dw|
Vocaloid
  • Vocaloid
first we find the number of valence electrons for all the elements in the compound S - > 6 Cl - > 7 O - > 6 6 + 6 + 7 + 7 = 26, giving us 13 pairs. we already used 3 pairs so far (1 pair between S and Cl, 1 pair between S and the other Cl, and 1 pair between S and O so we have 10 pairs left

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

Vocaloid
  • Vocaloid
now, let's complete the octet for chlorine by putting 3 lone pairs around each, like so:|dw:1439682298737:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1439682445756:dw| I have 13 pairs of electrons though!
Vocaloid
  • Vocaloid
well, true, you have the correct number of electrons, but generally speaking, the least electronegative element (sulfur in this case) forms the central atom, with the other atoms branching off of it
Vocaloid
  • Vocaloid
(I don't really have a good theoretical explanation as to why your structure is chemically unstable, @aaronq would probably do a better job of explaining > >)
Vocaloid
  • Vocaloid
anyway, continuing...
Vocaloid
  • Vocaloid
we have 4 pairs left, and we could theoretically put 3 lone pairs on oxygen like we did for chlorine (this isn't the best arrangement because of formal charge, but let's roll with it for now)
Vocaloid
  • Vocaloid
|dw:1439683181693:dw|
Vocaloid
  • Vocaloid
and that leaves 1 pair|dw:1439683232757:dw| for sulfur
Vocaloid
  • Vocaloid
^ the above lewis structure has the correct number of electron pairs, but it's still not the "best" structure once we take formal charge into account, where formal charge = number of valence electrons - (0.5)number of covalently bonded electrons - number of free electrons
Vocaloid
  • Vocaloid
we want each atom to have a formal charge of 0, so we take a look at each atom and calculate the formal charge... you can verify this yourself, but: FC of Cl = 0, so we're good FC of O = -1 FC of S = +1 we can fix this by changing one of the lone pairs on Oxygen to a double-bond on sulfur, like so...
Vocaloid
  • Vocaloid
|dw:1439683808843:dw|
Vocaloid
  • Vocaloid
and that completes our lewis structure...
Photon336
  • Photon336
|dw:1439688570446:dw|
Photon336
  • Photon336
SOCL2 can be used to create an acyl chloride; if I remember correctly it's like this I kind of find this compound fascinating; forgive some of the arrows in those figures. |dw:1439688743268:dw| |dw:1439688835198:dw| |dw:1439688975434:dw|
Photon336
  • Photon336
In O-chem you can see why that compound SOCl2 is useful. BTW i may have drawn some of the arrows wrong.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yeah, this is a great reaction in practice because it almost always goes to completion due to the fact that \(SO_2\) gas leaves. This is really handy for fun reactions like the Arndt-Eistert Homologation. Only problem is diazomethane is kind of dangerous.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.