anonymous
  • anonymous
I WILL GIVE A MEDAL TO ANY ONE CAN ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS!
History
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Now that you have read McCarthy’s telegram to President Truman and Truman’s (unsent) response, complete a journal assignment to summarize the main ideas of both primary source documents. Reread the McCarthy’s telegram to President Truman and Truman’s unsent reply. In one or two paragraphs, summarize the main ideas of each communication. Ask yourself the following questions: Which communication do you think did a better job of making an argument? Do you agree with Truman that McCarthy should not have accused people in a speech? Then, explain your answers to these questions and your overall impressions of both primary documents.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Do you the passage?
anonymous
  • anonymous
have the*

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
you have to look it up. They didn't provide it.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Oh okay. lemme read it up
misssunshinexxoxo
  • misssunshinexxoxo
Yes, it was wrongful for him to accuse anyone without proper evidence.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.