naga447
  • naga447
which of these people is correct with there proof? picture in attachments
Mathematics
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

naga447
  • naga447
1 Attachment
anonymous
  • anonymous
Is there a figure, to which these statements refer? Without a drawing or a figure of sort, you can't really tell who is right
anonymous
  • anonymous
Ok, it is about vertically opposite angles, I see consider the figure |dw:1439923377313:dw| The proof is about the pairs of opposite angles, \[\angle2,\angle4\] and \[\angle1,\angle3\] Being equal This property is knows as vertically opposite angles are equal or congruent and has a fairly simple proof. Now let's see what Kelly and Daniel are doing Let's look at Daniel first Hm, his proof looks good But there's a big problem with Kelly, she's trying to prove a theorem using the theorem ITSELF, how can you prove something if it's not given you, and if it's given to you, what's there to prove?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
What Kelly is doing is something like you are given \[x=3\] Now prove that \[x=3\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
I hope that makes sense
anonymous
  • anonymous
Sorry I mean, how can you prove something if it's already GIVEN to you, and if it's already given, what is there to prove?
naga447
  • naga447
If it is given it will be a fact or statement that is excepted as true and thank you for you last couple of reply's I was reading through them and I think it clicked
anonymous
  • anonymous
you're very welcome

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.