mytyl
  • mytyl
In session 5, clip 5, if X never equals to X(zero), how can X-X(zero)=0?
OCW Scholar - Single Variable Calculus
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
phi
  • phi
\[ x - x_0 \ne 0 \] rather he is saying \[ \lim_{x \rightarrow x_0} x-x_0 =0 \] He could have been a bit clearer by writing \[ \lim_{x \rightarrow x_0} \frac{f(x)}{x-x_0 }(x-x_0)\] and then using the theorem that the limit of a product is the product of the limits, to say \[ \lim_{x \rightarrow x_0} \frac{f(x)}{x-x_0 } \cdot \lim_{x \rightarrow x_0}(x-x_0) \] and then \[ f'(x)\cdot 0 = 0 \] For more backround see http://ocw.mit.edu/resources/res-18-006-calculus-revisited-single-variable-calculus-fall-2010/part-i-sets-functions-and-limits/lecture-4-derivatives-and-limits/ and the following lecture http://ocw.mit.edu/resources/res-18-006-calculus-revisited-single-variable-calculus-fall-2010/part-i-sets-functions-and-limits/lecture-5-a-more-rigorous-approach-to-limits/
mytyl
  • mytyl
So......\[\lim_{x \rightarrow x_{0}}(x-x_{0})=0?\]
phi
  • phi
yes

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
mytyl is right to be confused by this. In the lecture, the professor makes an off the cuff suggestion that the second part of the above limit is solved by making \[x =x_{o}\] He then, later in the lecture, takes specific time out of the lecture to state that it's important to remember that when solving the above limit, \[x \neq x{o}\] It's still correct to say that \[\lim_{x \rightarrow x{o}} (x - x{o}) = 0\] but the way the professor explained it was a bit confusing.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.