anonymous
  • anonymous
The inverse of a relation is graphed below. Is the original relation a function? http://media.apexlearning.com/Images/201306/19/c8a19f75-7cff-4cb6-aafd-5c6bd9be0ffc.jpg A. True B. False
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
would this be false ?
anonymous
  • anonymous
or true considering it reflexs over ?
Vocaloid
  • Vocaloid
well, have you heard of something called the vertical line test?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
yes if the line intersects a graph at only one point the graph then would represent an inverse. right?
Vocaloid
  • Vocaloid
if we draw a vertical line through the graph, the vertical line crosses the function more than once, so the graph is not a function. this also means the inverse IS a function
anonymous
  • anonymous
so it would be true . correct?
Vocaloid
  • Vocaloid
yup
anonymous
  • anonymous
thanks so much

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.