While reading two articles on the CIA’s functions, you discover that both articles have similar opinions and facts, but the first article’s author is a reporter and the second article’s author is a former CIA employee. Which article would be more relevant to your research?
the first article because it contains less bias
the first article because it is more objective
the second article because it contains more generalizations
the second article because it has a more reliable viewpoint
Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
will become a fan and give a meddle
The third answer is wrong, because they both have similar view points and facts. so it's less likely that one is more biased or objective than the other.
I think the answer has to deal with who's providing the facts. I think someone who works for the CIA would have a much more reliable view point.