Please help me UNDERSTAND this math question! I have a feeling about the correct answer so I've already narrowed it down!!
Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
According to the given information, quadrilateral RECT is a rectangle. By the definition of a rectangle, all four angles measure 90°. Segment ER is parallel to segment CT and segment EC is parallel to segment RT by the ________________. Quadrilateral RECT is then a parallelogram by definition of a parallelogram. Now, construct diagonals ET and CR. Because RECT is a parallelogram, opposite sides are congruent. Therefore, one can say that segment ER is congruent to segment CT. Segment TR is congruent to itself by the Reflexive Property of Equality. The Side-Angle-Side (SAS) Theorem says triangle ERT is congruent to triangle CTR. And because corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent (CPCTC), diagonals ET and CR are congruent.
Which of the following completes the proof?
Alternate Interior Angles Theorem
Converse of the Alternate Interior Angle Theorem
Converse of the Same-Side Angles Theorem
Same-Side Interior Angles Theorem
I'm thinking it has to be ONE of the last TWO.
Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.
Same-Side Interior Angles Theorem would prove the angles are supplementary once you know the segments are parallel.. They've already proven the angles are supplementary by the definition of the rectangle, and you don't know the segments are parallel yet.
Converse of the Same-Side Angles Theorem does the opposite. You know the angles are supplementary and you want to prove the segments are parallel. This is the correct reason
soo then the answer is C. Converse of the Same-Side Angles Theorem :/