anonymous
  • anonymous
Can someone please help me out?
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Calculate the above formula, expressing the answer in scientific notation with the correct number of significant figures:
1 Attachment
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
hint: \[\Large 1 \times {10^{ - 3}} = 0.001\]
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
and: \[\Large 3.61 \times {10^{ - 3}} = 0.00361\]

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
from your attachement I see this computation: \[\Large \left( {8.86 + 1.0 \times {{10}^{ - 3}}} \right) \div \left( {3.61 \times {{10}^{ - 3}}} \right)\] am I right?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yea you are right. I accidentally read the sign wrong. I was suppose to divide not add. So I should get 2.45429362881 right?
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
I got: \[\Large \left( {8.86 + 1.0 \times {{10}^{ - 3}}} \right) \div \left( {3.61 \times {{10}^{ - 3}}} \right) = 2.454 \times {10^3}\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
Do I need the full number or should I just shorten it to 2.454?
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
I think that we have to take at least 3 significant figures, so our result will be like below: \[\Large 2.45 \times {10^3}\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
What exactly are the significant figures? I was confused on that part.
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
the significant figures are 2, 4, and 5
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
another example: if we have a number like below: 1.0025 then the significant figures are: 1, 2, and 5
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
whereas, if we have this number: 1,200 then the significant figures are 1 and 2
anonymous
  • anonymous
So the signification figures would the answer to that part be 3? Or would the answer to that part be 2, 4, and 5.
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
if we have this number: 0.0025 then the significant figures are 2, and 5
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
your answer, is: \[\Large 2.45 \times {10^3}\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
So with scientific notation you only go 2 digits after the decimal right? I thought the answer was 2.454 x 10^-3. Or am I wrong on that part?
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
when we have a decimal point, the significant figures are the figures at the left and at the right with respect to that decimal point
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
so, the number 2.454 x 10^-3 has four significant figures
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
please, wait, is your computation an experimental measure?
anonymous
  • anonymous
I'm not sure what you mean on computation or experimental?
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
since 1*10^-3 has only one significant figure, then we have to rewrite our result with one significant figure, so your result is: \[\Large 2 \times {10^3}\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
I was just wondering on the scientific noation is both 2.45 and 2.454 both correct. It doesn't matter how I state it. Only difference is how many significant figures their are.
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
2.45 has three significant figures, whereas 2.454 has four significant figures
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
as a general prescription, we have to round off our result like the most inaccurate measure. Now our most inaccurate number is 1*10^-3 which has only one significant figure. So we have to round off our final result to one significant figure, so we get: \[\Large 2 \times {10^3}\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
I'm confused on how I'm suppose to state my answer. How should I write it?
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
it is simple, your measure has to be written like below: \[\Large 2 \times {10^3}\] which has only one significan figure, and such significant figure is 2
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
I have rounded off 2.454... to 2
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
please sorry, I see that the most inaccurate number is: 1.0 *10^-3 which has 2 significant figures, so we have to round off our result to 2 significant figures, so your result is: \[\Large 2.5 \times {10^3}\] I have rounded off 2.454... to 2.5 and 2.5 *10^3 has 2 significant figures, namely 2, and 5 Sorry again, for my error
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
more explanation: a number like this one: 1.0 has two significant figures, namely 1 and 0
anonymous
  • anonymous
Do I have to round when stating my answer? Does it matter how I state my answer also?
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
yes! since when you do a computation, using some formula, the result which you get, can not be as accurate as the most accurate measure
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
as a general prescription, the result which you get from a computation has to be as accurate as the less accurate measure
anonymous
  • anonymous
So how many digits should I state in the answer? Should I round it or not? I normally don't round it unless the question states to do so.
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
yes! you have to round it, like below: \[\Large 2.5 \times {10^3}\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
So is the answer is 2.5 x 10^3 or 2.5 x 10^-3 @Michele_Laino ? Do you need to take the - off with scientific notation? The original question had a -3 so I wasn't sure. Also for the significant figures there's two of them right? 2 and 5.
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
yes! the significant figures are 2 and 5, and the right result is 2.5 x 10^3
anonymous
  • anonymous
Thanks for all your help @Michele_Laino

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.