A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
ganeshie8
 one year ago
consider a regular \(2ngon\)
show that a horizontal flip followed by a vertical flip is equivalent to 180 degree rotation
ganeshie8
 one year ago
consider a regular \(2ngon\) show that a horizontal flip followed by a vertical flip is equivalent to 180 degree rotation

This Question is Closed

ganeshie8
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2dw:1440928722800:dw

ikram002p
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3what are you thinking of, interrupting it with geometrical coordinates or just prove symmetric on 2ngon in group way ?

ganeshie8
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2I think I have it using coordinate geometry(transformation rules) : Horizontal flip (x coordinate remains same, y coordinate changes sign) : \((x,y)\longrightarrow (x,y)\) after that, we do Vertical flip(x coordinate changes sign, y coordinate remains same) : \((x,y)\longrightarrow (x,y)\)

ganeshie8
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2next recalling that the rule for rotating 180 degrees is \((x,y)\longrightarrow (x,y)\) ends the proof

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Also consider the fact that the angle between the lines of your two reflections determines the angle of rotation (if you wanted to go that route)

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i.e. Two reflections are equivalent to a specific angle rotation. And the angle between the lines determines the rotation about their intersection point.

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Oh, and I forgot to mention that it's twice the angle between them. This means that since there is a 90 degree angle between the x and yaxis, there will be a 180 degree rotation.

ikram002p
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3what im trying to understand is why u have chosen a regular \(2ngon\) xD i believe it applies on each ngon, this is confusing me since im trying to know what is special about it but in general all rotation and fillips are alike for Dihedral groups xD or maybe i'm missing something out. dw:1440934919407:dw

ganeshie8
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2@jabberwock thanks! that works perfectly!

ganeshie8
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2@ikram002p when the number of sides is not even, we will not be haveing the element \(R_{180}\) in the dihedral group right ?

ikram002p
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3well that part is confusing me, since basically rotation in abstract algebra (R_something) mean identity and u need it to take origin form, how ever in geometry u can rotate anything u want as much as u want without such restrict xD if you know what i mean.

ikram002p
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3dw:1440936280877:dw

ganeshie8
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2Yes, i get what you mean. In dihedral groups, the rotations are restricted to a finite number : integer multiples of \(\large \dfrac{360}{n}\)

ganeshie8
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2where \(n\) = number of sides

ikram002p
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3exactly, but now i got what ur asking for xD

ganeshie8
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2after rotating, the polygon must look exactly same as before (overlap exactly)

ganeshie8
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2that applies to reflections also we only consider the reflections that overlap exactly with the initial polygon

ganeshie8
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2they are precisely the reflections over "symmetry lines" of the polygon

ganeshie8
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2and as you know every \(ngon\) has \(n\) symmetry lines

ikram002p
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.3it make sense to me now, been long time these stuff need to be reviewed.

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0You can also prove this from the perspective of complex analysis. Let \(z\) and \(w\) be complex numbers such that \(z^{2n}=w\), and let \(z=r\exp\left(i\theta_0\right)\) so that \(z=r\) and \(\arg z=\theta_0\). The \(2n\)th roots of \(w\) are then \[\large w^{\frac{1}{2n}}=z=r^{\frac{1}{2n}}\exp\left(\frac{\theta_0+2\pi k}{2n}i\right),\quad k=0,1,\ldots,2n1\] As you probably know, the \(n\)th roots of any complex number form a regular \(n\)gon around the origin. A reflection across the real axis (a "horizontal flip", as you put it) is equivalent to the mapping \(\xi\mapsto\bar{\xi}\) for any \(z\) in the plane, where \(\bar{\xi}\) is the complex conjugate of \(\xi\). A reflection across the imaginary axis ("vertical flip") is the same as \(\xi\mapsto\bar{\xi}\). Putting these transformations together yields \(\xi\mapsto\xi\). So, any of the \(2n\)th roots \(z\) simply become \(z\), which can be written as \[\large z=r^{\frac{1}{2n}}\exp\left(\frac{\theta_0+2\pi k}{2n}i\right),\quad k=0,1,\ldots,2n1\] On the other hand, a rotation of \(180^\circ\), or \(\pi\text{ rad}\), can be described by writing \(\arg z\) as \(\arg z^*:=\arg z+i\pi\), so we have \[\large z^*=r^{\frac{1}{2n}}\exp\left(\frac{\theta_0+2n\pi+2\pi k}{2n}i\right),\quad k=0,1,\ldots,2n1\] Now we just have to show that \(z=z^*\): \[\large\begin{align*} r^{\frac{1}{2n}}\exp\left(\frac{\theta_0+2\pi k}{2n}i\right)&=r^{\frac{1}{2n}}\exp\left(\frac{\theta_0+2n\pi+2\pi k}{2n}i\right)\\[2ex] \exp\left(\frac{\theta_0+2\pi k}{2n}i\right)&=\exp\left(\frac{\theta_0+(2n+2k)\pi}{2n}i\right)\end{align*}\] Take the logarithm of both sides, using the principal branch, i.e. \(\ln \xi=\ln(se^{it})=\ln s+it\). \[\large\begin{align*} \ln(1)+\frac{\theta_0+2\pi k}{2n}i&=\ln1+\frac{\theta_0+(2n+2k)\pi}{2n}i\\[2ex] i\pi+\frac{\theta_0+2\pi k}{2n}i&=\frac{\theta_0+(2n+2k)\pi}{2n}i\end{align*}\] and you can easily work out that the LHS=RHS.
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.