A scientific law states that planets move in elliptical orbits around stars. Which of these statements is correct about this law?
It is not strengthened by data and observations.
It provides explanations for observations which can change.
It is a well supported description which cannot become a theory.
It can change from time to time due to new scientific evidence
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I think that it is the first law of Kepler, namely planets move in elliptical orbits around the sun, and the sun is located at one of the focuses of such elliptical orbits. That statement comes from observations which are supported by numerical data. Nevertheless it can not be a theory, since it is an empirical statement