anonymous
  • anonymous
How did moving the capital from Rome to Constantinople weaken the western part of the empire?
History
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
madhu.mukherjee.946
  • madhu.mukherjee.946
The establishment of Constantinople did not weaken the western part of the empire. Constantinople was made the capital of the eastern part of the empire. Milan was made the capital of the western part. Rome became the nominal capital of the whole empire. Making Milan the capital of the west was designed to strengthen the western part. Milan was nearer the front of the frontiers along the Alps and the river Rhine which were under constant attacks. It was also where the cavalry-only forces, established by Emperor Gallienus as a rapid deployment force to reach the areas of the frontier under attack quickly, were based.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.