adajiamcneal
  • adajiamcneal
Please explain to me how i got these wrong
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
adajiamcneal
  • adajiamcneal
1 Attachment
anonymous
  • anonymous
Whenever you perform these operations while using sig figs, your final answer should have the same number of sig figs as the number with the LEAST number of sig figs. So, let's take the third one for example.\[485.369\div0.124=3914.26612903225806\]Now, let's see how many sig figs we should be using. For 485.369, this number has 6 sig figs. For 0.124, this number has 3 sig figs. So, since 3 < 6, our final answer should have 3 sig figs. Rounding our answer, it will be 3.91E3 (notice how scientific notation makes this nice and neat for sig figs.
adajiamcneal
  • adajiamcneal
wait now im even more confused. . .

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
Which part has you confused?
anonymous
  • anonymous
First of all, do you see how 485.369 has 6 sig figs?
adajiamcneal
  • adajiamcneal
yeah i get that part. i dont understand what the e is for
anonymous
  • anonymous
E is a shortcut for scientific notation. So, \(3.91E3 = 3.91\times10^3\) (Sorry for being ambiguous, I should've made that more clear.)
adajiamcneal
  • adajiamcneal
oh ok lol . so let me try another one on my own but dont leave just incase i dont get it pleasee
anonymous
  • anonymous
Sure :)
adajiamcneal
  • adajiamcneal
for A being that theres 2 significant figures on both sides does that mean the answer has 2?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Wait, one more thing, I forgot to mention. The rule ^ works for multiplication and division. Addition and subtraction is slightly different. For addition and subtraction, you use the number of decimal places of the LEAST amount of accuracy. So, for example, if we had: \[0.123 + 0.00132 = 0.12432\]However, 0.123 has the least number of decimal places, so your answer will be rounded to 3 decimal places. So, we would get 0.124.
anonymous
  • anonymous
So, for A, after you add them, your answer should have 1 number to the right of the decimal because 1.2 has the least precision.
adajiamcneal
  • adajiamcneal
oh ok so would that answer be 1.3 e3?
anonymous
  • anonymous
The 1.3 would be fine. You wouldn't need the e3 because the number isn't bigger than that. The reason I used the e3 before is because my answer to that first example would've been 3910 (compared to the original of 3914.266). 391 are DEFINITELY significant figures, but the 0 is in a bit of a gray area. So, to make sure that it's clear that we mean for 3 sig figs, we use scientific notation and say 3.91 e3. The 3.91 part shows that you meant to have 3 sig figs, and the e3 (or \(10^3\)) makes clear what your actual number is because 3\(3.91 \times 10^3 = 3190\), as we intended.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Ignore the 3 before the \(3.91\times 10^3\) at the end.
adajiamcneal
  • adajiamcneal
oh ok let me try one more?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Sure!
adajiamcneal
  • adajiamcneal
b would be 0.1 right?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Hmm, not quite. You're multiplying here, not adding, so your answer should have the same number of sig figs as the number with the \(least\) sig figs.
anonymous
  • anonymous
So, when adding and subtracting, you deal with decimal places. When multiplying and dividing, you deal with sig figs.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Maybe this will help? http://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/topicreview/bp/ch1/sigfigs.html
anonymous
  • anonymous
Ok, back.
adajiamcneal
  • adajiamcneal
it would be 0.16 ?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yes! Good job! Just to make sure you had the correct thought process, you got 0.156 in the original, both 1.2 and 0.13 had 2 sig figs, so your final answer will have 2 sig figs. 0.156 rounds to 0.16 when you have 2 sig figs.
adajiamcneal
  • adajiamcneal
Ok thank you so much :)
anonymous
  • anonymous
np :)

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.