Please explain to me how i got these wrong

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions.

A community for students.

Please explain to me how i got these wrong

Mathematics
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

1 Attachment
Whenever you perform these operations while using sig figs, your final answer should have the same number of sig figs as the number with the LEAST number of sig figs. So, let's take the third one for example.\[485.369\div0.124=3914.26612903225806\]Now, let's see how many sig figs we should be using. For 485.369, this number has 6 sig figs. For 0.124, this number has 3 sig figs. So, since 3 < 6, our final answer should have 3 sig figs. Rounding our answer, it will be 3.91E3 (notice how scientific notation makes this nice and neat for sig figs.
wait now im even more confused. . .

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

Which part has you confused?
First of all, do you see how 485.369 has 6 sig figs?
yeah i get that part. i dont understand what the e is for
E is a shortcut for scientific notation. So, \(3.91E3 = 3.91\times10^3\) (Sorry for being ambiguous, I should've made that more clear.)
oh ok lol . so let me try another one on my own but dont leave just incase i dont get it pleasee
Sure :)
for A being that theres 2 significant figures on both sides does that mean the answer has 2?
Wait, one more thing, I forgot to mention. The rule ^ works for multiplication and division. Addition and subtraction is slightly different. For addition and subtraction, you use the number of decimal places of the LEAST amount of accuracy. So, for example, if we had: \[0.123 + 0.00132 = 0.12432\]However, 0.123 has the least number of decimal places, so your answer will be rounded to 3 decimal places. So, we would get 0.124.
So, for A, after you add them, your answer should have 1 number to the right of the decimal because 1.2 has the least precision.
oh ok so would that answer be 1.3 e3?
The 1.3 would be fine. You wouldn't need the e3 because the number isn't bigger than that. The reason I used the e3 before is because my answer to that first example would've been 3910 (compared to the original of 3914.266). 391 are DEFINITELY significant figures, but the 0 is in a bit of a gray area. So, to make sure that it's clear that we mean for 3 sig figs, we use scientific notation and say 3.91 e3. The 3.91 part shows that you meant to have 3 sig figs, and the e3 (or \(10^3\)) makes clear what your actual number is because 3\(3.91 \times 10^3 = 3190\), as we intended.
Ignore the 3 before the \(3.91\times 10^3\) at the end.
oh ok let me try one more?
Sure!
b would be 0.1 right?
Hmm, not quite. You're multiplying here, not adding, so your answer should have the same number of sig figs as the number with the \(least\) sig figs.
So, when adding and subtracting, you deal with decimal places. When multiplying and dividing, you deal with sig figs.
Maybe this will help? http://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/topicreview/bp/ch1/sigfigs.html
Ok, back.
it would be 0.16 ?
Yes! Good job! Just to make sure you had the correct thought process, you got 0.156 in the original, both 1.2 and 0.13 had 2 sig figs, so your final answer will have 2 sig figs. 0.156 rounds to 0.16 when you have 2 sig figs.
Ok thank you so much :)
np :)

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question