De morgan's laws to write the negation of the following statement.
He is not in Canada, or he does not fly to montreal.
a. He is in Canada, and he flies to montreal.
b. He is in Canada, or he flies to montreal.
c. If he is in Canada, then he flies to montreal.
d. He is not in Canada, or he flies to montreal.
Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
He is not in canada = p
he does not fly to montreal = q
Your statement = ( p v q )
Negating the statement : ~( p v q )
Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.
You are correct, so just negate both of the statements individually.
The conjunction, "or", does not change though.
so it would be b.?
That's what i'm getting.
it is a bit more intuitive if you define
p = In Canada
q= flies to Montreal
so the statement can be written
(not p) or (not q)
use De Morgan's Law to write that as
not (p and q)
now negate that statement: not not (p and q) becomes
p and q
In Canada and flies to Montreal
more importantly, can you follow what I did?
yes so you took out the negation and added the conjunction
@phi why would or change to and?
you guys are confusing me lol