anonymous
  • anonymous
7. Show that the following conditional statement is a tautology without using truth tables.[p ∧ (p → q)] → q
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
zzr0ck3r
  • zzr0ck3r
Said in a very "basic" way You are saying two things with the ^ 1) p is there AND (the ^) 2) if p is there, q is there So finally we conclude that q must be there because we were told that if p was there q was there, and (because of the ^) we were also told that p was there :) Hope this helps. I live in Oregon and we have new laws.
Jack1
  • Jack1
new laws...?
zzr0ck3r
  • zzr0ck3r
yes

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
right

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.