A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

anonymous

  • one year ago

7. Show that the following conditional statement is a tautology without using truth tables.[p ∧ (p → q)] → q

  • This Question is Open
  1. zzr0ck3r
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Said in a very "basic" way You are saying two things with the ^ 1) p is there AND (the ^) 2) if p is there, q is there So finally we conclude that q must be there because we were told that if p was there q was there, and (because of the ^) we were also told that p was there :) Hope this helps. I live in Oregon and we have new laws.

  2. Jack1
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    new laws...?

  3. zzr0ck3r
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yes

  4. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    right

  5. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.