ghdoru11
  • ghdoru11
compute y(2) if y(0)=y'(0)=0 and y''-3y'+2y=xe^x
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
ghdoru11
  • ghdoru11
@SithsAndGiggles @beginnersmind @IrishBoy123 @Loser66 some of you can help me with this problem? i'll be thankful
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
i'm in i'd give it a good hard slap with a Laplace Transform, but there are probably other ways too.
ghdoru11
  • ghdoru11
i tried using the homogenous solution and the particular solution but i can't figure it out

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
so first you solved \[ y''-3y'+2y=0\] and you got an answer?
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
then you turned your mind to \[y''-3y'+2y=x \ e^x\]
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
for that particular solution, i'd try: \[y = (Px^2 + Qx + R) e^x \] normally: \(y = (Px + Q) e^x \) would be good but you already have an \(e^x\) term in the complementary solution
ghdoru11
  • ghdoru11
i don't know if it is right or not
1 Attachment
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
has this gone a bit skewy at the end? in terms of the IV's you should be putting those into the whole solution, not just the particular, unless i am misreading in terms of method, this is "Variation of Parameters"(??), because there is a really streamlined process on Paul's Online [together with a proof] it looks a lot like what you have done but with fewer steps so the Wronskian \[\left|\begin{matrix}e^{2x} & e^x \\ 2e^{2x} & e^x\end{matrix}\right| = - e^{3x}\] which gives \[y_p = -e^{2x} \int \frac{e^x.xe^x }{ -e^{3x} } \ dx + e^{x} \int \frac{e^{2x}.xe^x }{ -e^{3x} } \ dx \] which i reckon comes out as \[y_p = -xe^x - \frac{x^2e^x}{2}-e^x\] so \[y = -xe^x - \frac{x^2e^x}{2}-e^x + A e^{2x} + Be^x\] and put IV's in there for A = 1, B = 0 i've done a transform and i get the same thing link to Paul: http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/DE/VariationofParameters.aspx
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
another way, a bit quicker
1 Attachment
Jhannybean
  • Jhannybean
Your writing is a little messy!
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
it's deliberate! it's all a load of rubbish really, i just made it up and posted it :-))
ghdoru11
  • ghdoru11
@IrishBoy123 all you done there is the solve or just a part of it?
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
attachment is solution using transform, comments above are just a few comments on the way you are doing it. the solutions on Paul's seem very compact.
ghdoru11
  • ghdoru11
thank you for your time, now it's clear to me. hope i will pass the exam
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
if you're bothered, cover the solutions to the examples on Paul's Online and try them yourself good luck with everything!!!

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.