Clarence
  • Clarence
Suppose A is an invertible matrix. Which of the following statements are true? Explanations would be greatly appreciated! (a) A can be expressed as a product of elementary matrices. (b) A is row equivalent to the nxn identity matrix. (c) The equation Ax=0 has only the trivial solution. (d) The determinant of A is positive. (e) The transpose of A is also an invertible matrix. (f) A has a unique row echelon form. (g) The equation Ax=b may have two distinct non zero solutions for a non zero vector b.
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
a, b, c and e are true. d and g are not true f i'm still debating
anonymous
  • anonymous
i think f is false. if it were row-reduced echelon form then it would be true. Suppose\[A \rightarrow \left[\begin{matrix}1 & 2 \\ 0 & 1\end{matrix}\right] \rightarrow \left[\begin{matrix}1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1\end{matrix}\right]\] both are in row echelon form (the last is in row-reduced echelon form) thus row echelon form is not unique
Empty
  • Empty
Are you familiar with this property of determinants: \[det(AB)=det(A)*det(B)\] So if a matrix is invertible, then: \(AA^{-1} = I\) \[det(AA^{-1}) = det(I)\] \[det(A)*det(A^{-1}) = 1\] So we can rearrange this, \[det(A^{-1}) = \frac{1}{det(A)}\] So if the determinant of A is 0, then it doesn't have an inverse, because you can't divide by zero to find the determinant of of its inverse. Also you get this fancy little relationship between determinants.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.