Rose16
  • Rose16
I have another question, but please explain in more details. I do not have a good background, so even though you think it is not complicated, but actually I do not have the basic equation that I must use and the details. Therefore, I do not know how to solve this problem.
Physics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
Rose16
  • Rose16
this is my question
1 Attachment
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
|dw:1441570821588:dw|
Rose16
  • Rose16
Excuse me IrishBoy123 did you answer my question, I did not find the answer

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
so we're doing another fourier transform but the \(\sqrt{2 \pi}\)'s cancel out and its in the limit \(\bar k _x - \delta \lt k_x \lt \bar k _x + \delta \) can you process that?!
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
@Michele_Laino
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
so it's \[\huge \Psi(x,0) = \int_{\bar k _x - \delta }^{ \bar k _x + \delta} \ e^{i \ k_x \ x} \ dk_x\]
Rose16
  • Rose16
could you explain in more details? I do not know if you gave me the last result or not
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
|dw:1441575635884:dw| |dw:1441575674405:dw|
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
|dw:1441575769994:dw|
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
\[\huge \Psi(x,0) = \frac{1}{i \ x} \ \ e^{i \ k_x \ x} |_{k_x = \bar k _x - \delta }^{k_x = \bar k _x + \delta}\]
Rose16
  • Rose16
what I wrote in ( NOTE ), just additional information and what I took in class and I do not know if I have to use it or not? I wrote it because I thought that might be helpful from you. but the question does not include the NOTE. ....... Note: the exercise in Quantum Mechanics by Merzbacher if you want to research about.
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
if you follow through with that integral, i reckon you will get somewhere
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
i will be back tomorrow .... i really hope we can take it forward you should post your ideas here.
Rose16
  • Rose16
I hope so
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
This is it in long form, it is a inverse Fourier taken straight from the notes. I have no real idea what practical application you are looking at, but this makes sense just as a maths exercise. \[\ \Psi(x,0) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}}\int_{- \infty }^{ \bar k _x - \delta} \ 0 \ dk_x + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}}\int_{\bar k _x - \delta }^{ \bar k _x + \delta} \sqrt{2 \pi} \ e^{i \ k_x \ x} \ dk_x + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}}\int_{\bar k _x + \delta }^{ \infty} \ 0 \ dk_x\] \[\ = \int_{\bar k _x - \delta }^{ \bar k _x + \delta} \ e^{i \ k_x \ x} \ dk_x\] \[ = \frac{1}{i \ x} \ \left[ e^{i \ k_x \ x} \right]_{k_x = \bar k _x - \delta }^{k_x = \bar k _x + \delta}\] \[\implies \Psi(x,0) = \frac{2}{x} e^{i \ \bar k_x \ x} sin( \delta . x)\] \[\ |\Psi(x,0) |^2 = \frac{4}{x^2} sin^2( \delta . x)\]
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
hint: we can write your function \( \large \phi \left( {{k_x}} \right)\), like below: \[\Large \phi \left( {{k_x}} \right) = \sqrt {2\pi } \left\{ {\theta \left( {{{\overline k }_x} + \delta - {k_x}} \right) + \theta \left( {{k_x} - {{\overline k }_x} + \delta } \right)} \right\}\] where \( \large \theta \left( {{k_x}} \right)\) is the function of \( \large Heaviside \) or the "step function"
IrishBoy123
  • IrishBoy123
mmmmm...... http://bueler.github.io/M611F05/M611heaviside.pdf i got the signum when i put my solution to the inverse fourier back into the fourier ie \[ \Psi(x,0) = \frac{2}{x} e^{i \ \bar k_x \ x} sin( \delta . x)\] \[\Phi = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \ \frac{2}{x} e^{i \ \bar k_x \ x} sin( \delta . x) \ e^{-i \ \bar k_x \ x} dx\] \[= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \ \frac{2}{x} sin( \delta . x) \ dx\] |dw:1441635116625:dw| this is viscious stuff.
Rose16
  • Rose16
why do you think we use step function
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
because we can compute the requested function, applying the theory of distributions
Rose16
  • Rose16
Is what you sent the function that I have to put in the Fourier function and then I do many steps to find it, or the final results.
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
yes! For example, using the theory of distribution, we get this: \[\Large F\left( {{\delta _ + }\left( x \right)} \right) = \theta \left( \omega \right)\] where at the right side we have the Fourier trasform operator F, and: \[\Large {\delta _ + }\left( x \right) = \frac{1}{2}\delta \left( x \right) + \frac{1}{{2\pi i}}P\left( {\frac{1}{x}} \right)\] where P is the principal value of 1/x
Rose16
  • Rose16
it is so complicated for me
Michele_Laino
  • Michele_Laino
actually, the "delta" function, or the "Dirac" function is a generalized function or a distribution, here is why I have used some results of such theory are you familiar with the theory of distributions?
Rose16
  • Rose16
Actually No, for this reason I do not know how to use it or complete the steps

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.