Show that if v1, v2, and v3 are mutually orthogonal nonzero vectors in 3-space, and if a vector v in 3-space is expressed as: v=c1v1+c1v2+c3v3

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions.

- Zale101

- chestercat

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions

- Zale101

Then the scalars c1, c2, and c3 are given by the formula: \(\Large c_i=\LARGE \frac{(v*v_i)}{||V_i||^2}\)

- beginnersmind

v=c1v1+c1v2+c3v3
What happens if you take the scalar product with v1 on both sides?

- phi

i.e. what is the dot product of two orthogonal vectors?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

- Jhannybean

|dw:1441576756278:dw| oo this drawing tool is so cool!!

- Zale101

Hi! Sorry for the late reply! The dot product of the two orthogonal vectors is zero?

- Zarkon

yes

- Zale101

So v1*v2=0?

- beginnersmind

yes. So take the scalar product of
v=c1v1+c1v2+c3v3 and simplify.

- beginnersmind

So take the scalar product of v=c1v1+c1v2+c3v3 *with v1* and simplify.

- beginnersmind

You mean c1?

- beginnersmind

Zale are you there?

- Zale101

Yes, i'm sorry i dont understand what you meant :(

- Jhannybean

yeah that got a bit confusing @beginnersmind

- beginnersmind

Ok. I'll try to exlain:
We were given
v = c1v1+c2v2+c3v3.
Both sides of the equation represent the same vector (v) written in different ways.
So if we take the scalar product of v with v1 and c1v1+c2v2+c3v3 with v1 we get the same number.
I.e
v*v1 = ( c1v1+c2v2+c3v3)*v1
Clear so far?

- Jhannybean

Yep!

- beginnersmind

If not, can you tell me exactly which point is confusing?

- Zale101

Makes sense now, i got confused when you said "take the scale product" and i couldn't know which vectors to deal with.

- Zale101

so then the dot product would be v*v1?

- Zale101

Also, we can choose to simplify with either v2, v3 or v1?

- beginnersmind

v*v1 on the left hand side.
right hand side is
(c1v1 + c2v2 +c3v3)*v1 = c1(v1*v1) + c2(v2*v1) + c3(v3*v1)

- Zale101

Okay. I'm following along.

- Zale101

When it say i=1,2,3 what does that mean?

- Zale101

i'm sorry for asking too many questions lol

- beginnersmind

It means that
\[\Large c_i=\LARGE \frac{(v*v_i)}{||v_i||^2}\]
is actually 3 equations.
\[\Large c_1=\LARGE \frac{(v*v_1)}{||v_1||^2}\]
\[\Large c_2=\LARGE \frac{(v*v_2)}{||v_2||^2}\]
\[\Large c_3=\LARGE \frac{(v*v_3)}{||v_3||^2}\]

- Zale101

OH! That makes sense!! Thank you

- beginnersmind

Nah, it's cool. I'd rather you ask if you don't understand something :)

- Zale101

Now the question makes a lot sense now.

- Zale101

So the simplifications you did above when you used v*v1 can also be done with the rest: v*v2, v*v3
I though i'd have to do something different to get i.

- Zale101

Thanks @beginnersmind :)

- beginnersmind

No problem. Just to clarify though, do you understand how we get
\[\Large c_1=\LARGE \frac{(v*v_1)}{||v_1||^2}\]
from
\[v*v1= (c_1v_1+c_2v_2+c_3v_3)*v1\]

- Zale101

No, because i dont understand how you got v2, v3? when it only had v and vc in c1=(v*v1)/(||v||)^2

- Zale101

when it only had v and v1*

- beginnersmind

I started with
\[v*v1= (c_1v_1+c_2v_2+c_3v_3)*v1 \]
and got
\[\Large c_1=\LARGE \frac{(v*v_1)}{||v_1||^2}\]

- Zale101

c1||v||^2=v*v1

- Zale101

Oh okay.

- Zale101

Yeah it makes sense now.

- beginnersmind

So the question shouldn't be how I got v2,v3, but where did they go? :)

- Zale101

Yes

- Zale101

lol

- Zale101

I dont know if i can do this because it's different from your approach. Where it says C2=(v*v2)/(||v||^2) is it possible for me to use v=c1v1+c2v2+c3v3
and for v2, i solve for v2 by using v=c1v1+c2v2+c3v3 ?

- beginnersmind

Ok, I'll write it out properly then:
We start with
\(v= (c_1v_1+c_2v_2+c_3v_3)\) (this was given)
\(v*v1= (c_1v_1+c_2v_2+c_3v_3)*v1\)
\(v*v1= c_1(v_1*v_1)+c_2(v_2*v_1)+c_3(v_3*v_1)\)
now we note that \((v_1*v_2) = 0\) and \((v_1*v_3) = 0\) because v1 is orthogonal to v2 and v3. This was the key step. So
\(v*v1= c_1(v_1*v_1)\)
remembering that a vector's scalar product with itself is the square of its length (v1*v1 = ||v1||^2):
\[\Large v*v_1=c_1||v_1||^2\]
or
\[\Large c_1=\LARGE \frac{(v*v_1)}{||v_1||^2}\]

- beginnersmind

For c2 you do the same thing, except now you take the scalar product with v2. This gets rid of the terms with v1 and v3.

- Zale101

I had to keep in my that it states that the orthogonal of v1*v2 is zero.
Alright, thanks for all the beautiful and detailed explanation.

- beginnersmind

No problem, thanks for sticking with it :)

- Zarkon

you should use \cdot. it looks nicer
and also use \| v_1\| for \(\|v_1\|\)
\[\Huge c_1=\LARGE \frac{v\cdot v_1}{\|v_1\|^2}\]
vs
\[\Huge c_1=\LARGE \frac{v*v_1}{||v_1||^2}\]

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.