At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
Anthony is studying how quickly children tire based on the amount of sugar they ingest. He splits a group of 20 children into 2 groups. One group is given sugar and the other is not. Anthony asks the children to start playing at a playground at the same time, and to stop when they tire, measuring the time each child stops playing. He finds that the children who did not ingest sugar played 2 minutes longer than those who did ingest sugar. Anthony rerandomizes the data, calculates the difference between the means, and creates the dot plot shown below. Based on the data, can Anthony conclude the difference is significant?
Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.
So my options are:
A: Yes Anthony can conclude the difference is significant because a 2-minute difference is not likely to happen by chance
B: No, Anthony cannot conclude the difference is significant because a 2-minute difference is likely to happen by chance.
C: Yes, Anthony can conclude the difference is significant because 0.25 is the difference in means that occurs most often.
D: No, Anthony cannot conclude the difference is significant because 0.25 is the difference in means that occurs most often.
I think it is C but it is honesty just a guess.