A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

anonymous

  • one year ago

Which statement BEST describes John Locke’s argument against the “divine right of kings” theory of government? A. Kings cannot have divine right because they are not officially part of the church. B. There is no scientific evidence supporting the existence of a divine right of kings. C. Divine right can only be claimed by those who afford basic rights to the people they rule. D. While kings have a divine right to rule, they are responsible for providing basic rights to their subjects.

  • This Question is Closed
  1. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    B: There is no scientific evidence supporting the existence of a divine right of kings.

  2. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.