cgbork
  • cgbork
A particle's position is r(vector) =(ct^2−2dt^3)i^+(2ct^2−dt^3)j^, where c and d are positive constants. Find expressions for times t > 0 when the particle is moving in the x-direction. Express your answer in terms of the variables c and d. can anybody walk me through how to even approach this problem? I am totally lost.
Physics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Have you taken calculus by any chance? And If so is this a calculus based class?
anonymous
  • anonymous
I can walk you through it but I need to think about how to tailor my approach based on your level.
cgbork
  • cgbork
Yes. This is calc based. I believe the derivative needs to be taken to solve this

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
Correct the instantaneous rate of change of position is velocity, and that can be calculated by taking the derivative. This seems function seems to be fairly tame, do you recall the derivative rule for polynomials?
cgbork
  • cgbork
not entirely. I am on a site for my class where it deducts 5% every time I guess wrong. I have put in d^2r/dt^2 and it said it didn't depend on dt or r
anonymous
  • anonymous
Sorry I didnt see that you had returned hold on...
anonymous
  • anonymous
Ok is this the function you gave:
anonymous
  • anonymous
\[ r(t)= (c*t^{2} - (2d)*t^{3})i+((2c)*t^{2} - d* t^{3})j \]
anonymous
  • anonymous
Note how I made sure not to run the constants together with the independent variable... * denotes typical multiplication but I added it explicitly to make sure this is what you had in the problem statement
anonymous
  • anonymous
Are you still there?
cgbork
  • cgbork
Internet failed
anonymous
  • anonymous
Hello
anonymous
  • anonymous
So if a particle is moving in the x-direction what does that mean?
anonymous
  • anonymous
It means the x-component of its velocity is non-zero... Please check to make sure you copied the question correctly because I suspect something is missing here.
cgbork
  • cgbork
I believe it is correct
cgbork
  • cgbork
My hint was this.. Hint 1. You will have to take a derivative with respect to time to get the velocity of the particle.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Correct, but what I am getting at is only requiring the x-component of the velocity v_x to be non-zero results in only one point where t>0 and v_x is zero and that is t=c/(3d).... I was expecting an interval or something more than a single point
anonymous
  • anonymous
So in other words any time t>0 except fot that point t=c/(3d) the particle is moving in the x direction
cgbork
  • cgbork
I already tried t=c/3d and it said I was missing something
cgbork
  • cgbork
Specifically, Your answer either contains an incorrect numerical multiplier or is missing one.
anonymous
  • anonymous
No at that point there is NO motion in the x-direction. At that point v_x is zero... at all other times besides that point there is some motion in the x-direction
cgbork
  • cgbork
Oh crap. That is because I found it when t=0 and it was asking for when it is greater than 0. So how would I find it when it isn't 0, but instead t>0?
anonymous
  • anonymous
No that is the answer for when t > 0. When t=0 the answer is just v_x = 0 plain and simple but when t >0 you get c-3dt=0 or t = c/(3d)
anonymous
  • anonymous
Like I said I feel like this question is either ill posed or incorrect... If that isn't the answer.... all t =/= c/(3d)
anonymous
  • anonymous
Does it mean in the POSITIVE x direction maybe?
cgbork
  • cgbork
It was asking for t>0 but told me that c/3d was wrong. This computer program for this question is on crack.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yes because it IS wrong.... The answer is all t NOT equal to that value
cgbork
  • cgbork
So I need to make an equation that excludes that point
anonymous
  • anonymous
Assuming any motion in the x-direction (either way) is permitted.
anonymous
  • anonymous
sure try 0
cgbork
  • cgbork
Part a is asking for the x direction and part b is asking for the y direction. So I'm hoping once I understand how to get part a that part b will be a breeze. Are you sure it is asking for all of that?
anonymous
  • anonymous
No Im not sure like I said I feel like this question is missing some information or poorly written or something. I mean have you tried the above answer?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Having only a single point seems kind of silly to me... I feel like it should be an interval or something.... Asking only about POSITIVE x-direction or something would make more sense
anonymous
  • anonymous
But that is just a guess
cgbork
  • cgbork
All of 0
anonymous
  • anonymous
if it were in the positive x-direction then the as long as 2ct > 6dt^2 or as long as 2c >6dt or c/(3d) > t
anonymous
  • anonymous
So for all times 0 < t < c/(3d)
anonymous
  • anonymous
After that the velocity becomes negative (moves in the -x-direction) and stays that ways forever
anonymous
  • anonymous
Did you try that?
cgbork
  • cgbork
I don't know if I can put it in like that
cgbork
  • cgbork
I figured it out. Yay for physics roommate! Thank you for trying!!!
anonymous
  • anonymous
So what did the answer end up being?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.