Howard-Wolowitz
  • Howard-Wolowitz
simple but complex question
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
Howard-Wolowitz
  • Howard-Wolowitz
@kropot72
kropot72
  • kropot72
There is more than one way to determine if there are outliers in data. Do you have "the procedure from the previous question" ?
Howard-Wolowitz
  • Howard-Wolowitz
no because its a different type of question

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
I usually used this definition: Large outliers= an observation which is farer than 2.5 standard deviations from the mean. In this case, st.dev.=2.6 and mean 3.0. moreover, there is an observation=10.5, namely the maximum. since 10.5 is more than 3(2.5x2.6), then we can conclude that 10.5 is an outlier. Having said that, it should be stressed out that whether an observation is a large outlier or not, is a matter of convention.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.