A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

amonoconnor

  • one year ago

"Determine the Infinite Limit: lim[(x+2)/(x+3)] as x approaches 3 from the right." My book says it's negative Infinity, and I don't know how to get this. I got 5/6.... What's the correct process to solve this, to "determine the infinite limit"? Any and all help is greatly appreciated!

  • This Question is Closed
  1. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    whats the equation u have

  2. amonoconnor
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    lim\[\lim_{x \rightarrow 3+}[(x+2)/(x+3)]\]

  3. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    dame idk maybe @cliffordtapp

  4. thomas5267
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    The book probably meant x approaches *-3* from the right since 5/6 is the correct limit.

  5. amonoconnor
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    5/6 is correct? Thank you so much!

  6. thomas5267
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    I believe your book is quite bad since the term infinite limit refers to the limit as x approaches infinity or negative infinity according to my understanding.

  7. anonymous
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yes he right

  8. thomas5267
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Since x is approaching a finite number, it would not be a infinite limit although the value of such limit is finite. That is: \[ \lim_{x\to\color{red}{\infty}}f(x)\quad\text{Infinite limit}\\ \lim_{x\to\color{red}{-\infty}}f(x)\quad\text{Infinite limit}\\ \lim_{x\to\color{red}{3}}f(x)=\infty \quad\text{Finite limit}\\ \]

  9. amonoconnor
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Wait, maybe I really don't know how to do these, but wouldn't it be -1/0 if evaluated with x approaching -3+?

  10. thomas5267
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    EDIT: Not fully awake. Since x is approaching a finite number, it would not be a infinite limit although the value of such limit is *infinite*. That is:

  11. thomas5267
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    One does not simply divide by zero.

  12. amonoconnor
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Right, obviously... but I'm not "dividing", that's how it would work out to, right?

  13. amonoconnor
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    \[\lim_{x \rightarrow -3+}(x+2)/\lim_{x \rightarrow -3+}(x+3) = (-3+2)/(-3+3) = (-1/0) ?\]

  14. thomas5267
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Dividing by zero is a meaningless expression in mathematics. If directly evaluating the limit yields \(\dfrac{-1}{0}\) or \(\dfrac{1}{0}\), then you have to find the limit in other ways.

  15. amonoconnor
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Alright. So... what other ways/avenues?

  16. thomas5267
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    @freckles I will leave this to you. I have no idea how to explain the evaluation of a limit with infinite as its value without using the delta-epsilon thing.

  17. freckles
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    \[\lim_{x \rightarrow -3^+} \frac{x+2}{x+3} \\ \text{ of } -3^+ \text{ means to the right of -3 } \\ \text{ so } x>-3 \\ \text{ now adding 2 on both sides gives } x+2>-3+2=-1 \\ \text{ this means } x+2 \text{ is near } -1 \\ \\ \text{ now adding both sides by 3 we have } x+3>0 \\ \text{ we already know } \lim_{x \rightarrow -3^+}\frac{x+2}{x+3} \text{ is one of the infinities } \\ \text{ and we know the result is } \frac{negative }{positive } \infty \]

  18. freckles
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    if we had \[\lim_{x \rightarrow -3^-}\frac{x+2}{x+3} \\ \text{ the } -3^- \text{ means we are looking to the left of -3 }\] \[\text{ so } x<-3 \\ \text{ which means } x+3<0 \text{ which says } x+3 \text{ is negative } \\ \text{ now adding 2 on both sides } x+2<-1 \\ \text{ so for this one we have } \frac{negative }{negative } \infty \]

  19. freckles
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    and of course neg/pos=neg and neg/neg=pos

  20. amonoconnor
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I think I understand everything except for where you said that "we already know that (the equation of the limit) is one of the infinities" ...What does that mean? How do you know that?

  21. freckles
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    if you have something/0 where the top something isn't 0 then you know the limit is one of the infinities

  22. amonoconnor
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    That wouldn't mean that the Limit doesn't exist? :/

  23. freckles
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    infinity is not a number so yes you could say the limit does not exist but sometimes the instructor or it is also more meaningful to say what kind of non-existence the limit is if you can

  24. amonoconnor
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    So it's like a limit can be an integer that a function STOPS at, but reaches on a graph/data set nonetheless, but sometimes, the "STOPPING" point is the arbitrarily unreachable value that the graph just gets infinitely close to, in this case -infinity?

  25. freckles
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    the limit being infinity or -negative infinity at x=some finite number is that you have a vertical asymptote there I think something people say the graph blows up there if that makes more sense for example f(x)=1/x looks like: |dw:1442259490849:dw| notice at x=0 we have a vertical asymptote for x>0 the y values are climbing up with non-stop (y values are getting bigger) for x<0 the y values are falling down with non-stop (y values are getting negative big) so we say \[\lim_{x \rightarrow 0^+} \frac{1}{x}= +\infty \text{ or you can just say } \infty \\ \lim_{x \rightarrow 0^-}\frac{1}{x}=-\infty \\ \text{ but yeah it is true in either case you could say } \\ \text{ the limit does not exist } \\ \] you would definitely say \[\lim_{x \rightarrow 0}\frac{1}{x} \text{ does not exist }\]

  26. freckles
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    for x>0 the y values are climbing up with non-stop (y values are getting bigger) for x<0 the y values are falling down with non-stop (y values are getting negative big) (by the way I'm saying this as we approach x=0)

  27. amonoconnor
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1442259591580:dw|

  28. freckles
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    |dw:1442259887019:dw|

  29. amonoconnor
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Is this what it would look like here? I know what an asymptote is, I just don't understand where the infinity is here. Is it that these graphs will, as they approach -3 on the x axis, move closer and closer to negative infinity on the negative y-axis, because -3 is an asymptote?

  30. amonoconnor
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Gotcha. So the "Limit", L, = -infinity, which is a y-value (technically), derived from all of this from finding 0 in the denominator when standard algebraic evaluation was used? Therefore, we understand that it is an asymptote, where x approaches?

  31. freckles
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    \[\lim_{x \rightarrow a^+} f(x)=-\infty \text{ means as } x \text{ approaches } x=a \text{ from the right } \\ \text{ the } y \text{ values will keep getting negative large }\] basically it means you will see the y values decrease with non-stop as you approach -3 from the right

  32. freckles
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    I think I will agree to that

  33. freckles
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    but sometimes when we have 0 in the denominator this doesn't always mean we have a vertical asymptote

  34. freckles
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    it could mean we have a hole if we also have a factor of 0 on top when pluggin in the number that x approaches

  35. thomas5267
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    \[ \lim_{x\to \color{red}{c}}f(x) \text{ exists if and only if }\lim_{x\to \color{red}{c^+}}f(x)=\lim_{x\to \color{red}{c^-}}f(x) \]

  36. freckles
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    \[\lim_{x \rightarrow 3} \frac{x-3}{x-3} \\ \text{ for example here if you plug in 3 you get } \frac{0}{0} \\ \text{ but notice } \frac{x-3}{x-3} =1 \text{ when } x \neq 3 \\ \text{ so } \lim_{x \rightarrow 3} \frac{x-3}{x-3} = \lim_{x \rightarrow 3}1 =1 \\ \text{ so here we do not have a vertical asymptote at } x=3 \\ \text{ but we have a hole at } x=3 \\ \text{ for the graph of } f(x)=\frac{x-3}{x-3}\]

  37. amonoconnor
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    The original problem specified that it was from the right, but yes, I agree. You have to check both sides if it's general.

  38. freckles
    • one year ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    so if you plug in your number and you get something/zero (where top something isn't 0) then you know you have one of the infinities if you plug in your number and you get zero/zero you have more work to do. you could still have limit that exists or a limit that doesn't exist for this case...

  39. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.