• trwatkins1
Which best describes a consequence of Tolkien's decision to set The Hobbit in Middle-earth rather than a real place? A. The setting allowed him to write about characters who had flaws and did not always do the right thing. B. The setting allowed him to invent all different kinds of imaginary creatures, myths, and gods. C. The setting allowed him to write about a heroic figure who goes on a quest. D. The setting allowed him to give his novel a happy ending rather than a tragic one.
  • Stacey Warren - Expert
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at in under 10 minutes. Go to now for free help!
  • trwatkins1
  • trwatkins1
how bout tis one
  • dehelloo
B. The setting allowed him to invent all different kinds of imaginary creatures, myths, and gods is correct. A is wrong because flaws are evident especially in the real world. C is wrong heroic figures can occur in real settings. Think Ghandi lol D is wrong because a novel set in fictional setting or a more realistic setting can have either a happy or tragic ending by virtue of the fact that it is up to the reader's imagination

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.