A scientist studying the effects of gamma rays on marigolds gathered the data shown below. Hypothesis: Marigolds exposed to higher levels of radiation will not grow as well as marigolds that are exposed to less radiation.

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions.

A community for students.

A scientist studying the effects of gamma rays on marigolds gathered the data shown below. Hypothesis: Marigolds exposed to higher levels of radiation will not grow as well as marigolds that are exposed to less radiation.

Biology
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

Plant A: Gamma Rays (Rad/day) is 5. Water (mL/week) 50. Sunlight (hours/day) 0. Height (cm) 4. Plant B: Gamma Rays (Rad/day) is 10. Water (mL/week) 50. Sunlight (hours/day) 2. Height (cm) 7. Plant C: Gamma Rays (Rad/day) is 15. Water (mL/week) 50. Sunlight (hours/day) 5. Height (cm) 10. The scientist came to the conclusion that the hypothesis was incorrect. Why is the scientist's conclusion flawed? A. The scientist's conclusion is flawed because the height of the plants changed and, therefore, the experiment is not controlled. B. The scientist's conclusion is flawed because the amount of gamma rays changed and, therefore, the experiment is not controlled. C. The scientist's conclusion is flawed because the number of hours of sunlight changed and, therefore, the experiment is not controlled. D. The scientist's conclusion is flawed because the amount of water was not changed and, therefore, the experiment is not controlled.
The scientist came to the conclusion that the hypothesis was incorrect. Why is the scientist's conclusion flawed? A. The scientist's conclusion is flawed because the height of the plants changed and, therefore, the experiment is not controlled. B. The scientist's conclusion is flawed because the amount of gamma rays changed and, therefore, the experiment is not controlled. C. The scientist's conclusion is flawed because the number of hours of sunlight changed and, therefore, the experiment is not controlled. D. The scientist's conclusion is flawed because the amount of water was not changed and, therefore, the experiment is not controlled. Is C I'm thinking

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1442262047
it was c thanks

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question