baru
  • baru
On lecture 13, (lecture on lagrange multipliers), An "advanced example" is solved. i think there is an error... while writing the equation for the constraint ( area of the base is a known constant), the lines u1, u2 and u3 are ASSUMED to be perpendicular to each of the given sides, if u1 u2 and u3 were indeed perpendicular, there is only one possibility for the lengths of u1,u2 and u2. thus they are known values and there is no problem to solve, the function that needs to be minimized has no variables in it!!
OCW Scholar - Multivariable Calculus
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

baru
  • baru
here's the link to the lecture im talking about http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-02sc-multivariable-calculus-fall-2010/2.-partial-derivatives/part-c-lagrange-multipliers-and-constrained-differentials/session-41-advanced-example/

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.