FireKat97
  • FireKat97
I really need help with this question...
Engineering
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
FireKat97
  • FireKat97
FireKat97
  • FireKat97
this is how I labelled the reaction forces
1 Attachment
FireKat97
  • FireKat97
So for part A using my FBD, I set up the following equations- ∑Fx = 0, -Lx = 0 therefore Lx = 0 ∑Fy = 0, Hy -P -Q + Ly = 0 ∑ML = 0, 8Hy - 4P - 2Q = 0 therefore Hy = P/2 + Q/4 so we sub Hy into ∑Fy equation, and get Ly = P/2 + 3Q/4 so those are the reactions I have calculated for the supports, and all my assumed directions are correct as all my "values" came out positive. Can someone please confirm if I have done this correctly?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

FireKat97
  • FireKat97
And b has me totally stumped, would I have to use Sections method?
surry99
  • surry99
Yes method of sections will work for b)
FireKat97
  • FireKat97
where would I cut the section @surry99?
surry99
  • surry99
Suppose you want the force in BJ first. Then you must cut BJ, Now which other members would you cut at the same time? Try a few options and look at the resulting FBD's. Do the resulting FBD's allow you to determine the force in BJ?
surry99
  • surry99
Post your attempt and I would be happy to check it later.
FireKat97
  • FireKat97
so I had figured that DI = IE = KF = KG = 0 as they are all zero force members (I think) and if the above is correct, then since load at K is 2kN downward, from y equilibrium, KC should be 2kN upward and so CK would be 2 kN downward (action reaction forces) I then thought I'd make a cut down EC, JF and JK and use moments and equilibriums to solve for JC (JC = JF) and from doing this I found JF = √8 , JB = 1 (∑y equilibrium) and JK =2, but I am really uncertain of my answers @surry99 and thanks so much for your help! :)
FireKat97
  • FireKat97
And also Im unsure on how to determine if forces are under compression or tension..
surry99
  • surry99
If a member is being pulled on it is in tension. If a member is being pushed on, it is in compression. Please post your work and I will take a look.
FireKat97
  • FireKat97
So what I did was Mc = -(JK X 2) - (1 X 2) + (6 X 1) = 0 So -2JK -2 + 6 = 0 jK = 2 Then Mb = -(2 X JK) -( 2 X 1/sqrt(2) JC) + (4 X 1) = 0 So JC = 0 so JF = 0 and BJ = 1 (explained above) and CK = 2 (explained above) and for some reason I'm now getting JF = 0 instead of sqrt(8)
FireKat97
  • FireKat97
I would post a pic of my working out but my phone isn't letting me :/
mathmate
  • mathmate
@firekat97 have you solved the problem yet?
FireKat97
  • FireKat97
Not entirely... Still confused hahaha
mathmate
  • mathmate
@firekat97 If you have a chance to post your last version of your work (with your phone or otherwise), I'll be glad to look at it.
FireKat97
  • FireKat97
@mathmate okay 👍 thanks

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.