A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
anonymous
 one year ago
Hello, I'm having a little trouble with this one problem I'm on. It gives me vector r = {2t i + 4t^2 j} ft and it asks me to determine the radial component and the transverse component of the particle's velocity at t = 2 s. I've already found the radial component of the velocity, v_r = 16.0 ft/s. But I can't figure out how to find the transverse component. I know v_theta = r(deriv. of theta), but I can't figure out where I'm supposed to get theta from. I've tried a couple of things, but neither of them worked. Is there anyone online that can help me?
anonymous
 one year ago
Hello, I'm having a little trouble with this one problem I'm on. It gives me vector r = {2t i + 4t^2 j} ft and it asks me to determine the radial component and the transverse component of the particle's velocity at t = 2 s. I've already found the radial component of the velocity, v_r = 16.0 ft/s. But I can't figure out how to find the transverse component. I know v_theta = r(deriv. of theta), but I can't figure out where I'm supposed to get theta from. I've tried a couple of things, but neither of them worked. Is there anyone online that can help me?

This Question is Closed

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0@IrishBoy123 I see you're viewing my question. Might you be able/willing to help me?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0OKay, cool. So like I said, I can't figure out what the question is trying to get me to do.

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5first of all we are working along the vector \(\vec r = <2t, 4t^2> = <4,16>_{t=2}\) which gives us \( \vec {\dot r} = <2,8t> = <2,16>_{t=2}\) is that agreed?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Yes, that's correct.

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5you say \(v_r = 16\) how did you get that? because i see the need to resolve the components along \(\vec r\)

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0That would be the magnitude of v_r, which is roughly 16.0 ft/s. MasteringEngineering said I was right, so I believe it is so. Although Mastering's answer is rounded a little different, as the actual answer I got was closer to 16.12 ft/s.

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5ok let me crunch some numbers then

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5mmm what you have calculated is \(\vec{\dot r} = \sqrt{2^2 + 16^2} = 16.12\) ie you have calculated the speed of the particle

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5if you resolve \(\vec{\dot r}\) along \(\vec r\), you get \(v_r = 16.000735\) is that closer to their answer?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Yes. I found \[v _{r}\]. I am looking for \[v _{\theta}\], which is described as v_theta = r(dtheta/dt) (I don't know how to write it with the dot overhead on this thing).

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0My problem is I don't know how to get theta, or if it's even relevant here, since everything seems to be in cartesian coordinates.

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5OK is my answer closer to the website's? we can deal with the rest in a minute

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5dw:1443088796660:dw

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Yes. to three sig figs, it is \[v _{r} = 16.0\]. But like I said, we already knew that one.

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5what they wany when they say radial velocity is this dw:1443088879804:dw

PatrickWeeWoos
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Good morning all you amazing people!!!!!

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5do you see it yet v is the tangential velocity of the paticle \(\vec v_r\) is the velocity resolved along \(\vec r\)

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5to get that \(\vec v_r\), you need to find the unit vector along \(\vec r\), and then you claculate the dot product of that and \(\vec v\), that resolves \(\vec v \) radially

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5so are we ready to do it?

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5dw:1443089158375:dw

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Sure. It's not what I was asking for, but sure, let's do this.

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5your answer is out because you have calculated the "speed" of the particle ie \(\sqrt{2^2 + 16^2}\) that is not the radial component. the radial component is gotten this way do you wish to proceed? i honestly do not want to waste your time if this is not what you want to do just let me know

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0What's the difference? Like I said, I used the radial speed for the problem I'm doing right now and the site already said that I was right. I'm looking for transverse velocity at this point.

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5well the site is wrong as there is a rounding error in there. i thought we had agreed that! we can skip the radial bit and go to the tangential bit then we need the unit tangent vector dw:1443089994080:dw so that we can resolve the particles velocity in that direction dw:1443090134203:dw

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5but we need to the unit radial to get that we have \(\large \vec r = <2t, 4t^2> = <4,16>_{t=2}\) so \(\large \hat{ r} = \frac{<4,16>}{\sqrt{4^2+16^2}} = \frac{<1,4>}{\sqrt{17}}\) so \(\large \hat{ t} = \frac{<4,1>}{\sqrt{17}}\) so \(\large v_t = \vec {\dot r} \bullet \hat{ t} = <2,16>\bullet \frac{<4,1>}{\sqrt{17}} = 1.94m/s\)

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5does that make sense to you?

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0You have me up until you have \[t = \frac{ <4, 1> }{ \sqrt{17} }\]. Where'd you get that?

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5it comes directly from from \(\hat r\): switch the x,y and multiply one of them by 1 and you get the perpendicular vector. a bit like \(m_1 * m_2 = 1\) if 2 straight lines are perpendicular. try it: \(\hat r \bullet \hat t = 0\) also, in terms of radial velocity: \[\large v_r = \vec {\dot r} \bullet \hat{ r} = <2,16>\bullet \frac{<1,4>}{\sqrt{17}} = 16.007m/s\] which is the correct radial velocity

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5Oh, a word about the word "transverse" i have been using the term tangential . just to be totally clear, the transverse is what we are calculating and have calculated, and is the one that runs perpendicular to the radial as per the drawings clearly there is a tangent to the path of the particle too but that is just \( \vec{\dot r}\).

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5dw:1443091705155:dw

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Okay, I see what you're saying. Going by that logic then, let's say I wanted to find the components for acceleration next. Going by the steps you've presented, I would basically be repeating the same process over again, right? Only with the velocity vector in the place of the position vector. Resolve a_t and a_n both tangentially and in the direction of v_r, respectively, and then find t to solve for each dot product? Or am I missing something?

PatrickWeeWoos
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i gave you a medal!

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5stick with the \(\hat r\) and \(\hat t\) for resolving purposes and calculate \(\vec a \bullet \hat r\) and \(\vec a \bullet \hat t\) for radial and transverse purposes

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So I don't even use v at all except for when I'm solving for it?

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5not for resolving acceleration into its components, no

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0But I thought acceleration was by definition, the derivative of velocity.

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Also, it's worth mentioning that I'm not given the magnitude of the acceleration.

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So the dot product you describe wouldn't actually work in this case.

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5oh! ok, crossed wires here we have \[\vec {\dot r} = <2,8t> = <2,16>_{t=2}\] whence \(\vec a = \vec {\ddot r} = <0,8> \) and \(\vec a_r = \vec a \bullet \hat r\), and \(\vec a_t = \vec a \bullet \hat t\)

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5\(\frac{32}{\sqrt{17}}\) and \(\frac{8}{\sqrt{17}}\)

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Just ran the numbers. You were right. Damn, if what my Dynamics prof. taught in the lecture turn out to be totally useless. Equations did not apply here; needed visual representations and dot products to get the picture. This is embarrassing...

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Thanks, by the way, for you patience in helping me out.

IrishBoy123
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.5you can do this with loads and loads of fiddling around too, resolving things here and there. this is just an easy way to get there. mp:p

anonymous
 one year ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Well, thanks again. I'm going to close this thread now.
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.