anonymous
  • anonymous
The Roman Empire fell in the year 476. This was in which century? A. fifth B. fourth C. third
History
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
Mr.Z
  • Mr.Z
I think A.
Mr.Z
  • Mr.Z
I'm pretty sure it's A.
anonymous
  • anonymous
It is, the fifth century.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

Mr.Z
  • Mr.Z
I said that. >_>
BishopPatton
  • BishopPatton
Correct answer is A. The 4th was 300 - 399 3rd wass 200 - 299 and 5th was 400 - 499
anonymous
  • anonymous
You seemed unsure ;3 @Mr.Z
BishopPatton
  • BishopPatton
And please do not post direct answers without explaining. It is against the CoC
BishopPatton
  • BishopPatton
So if you dont have an explanation dont answer
anonymous
  • anonymous
thanks evrey one
anonymous
  • anonymous
I could've easily explained, Bishop.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I just found it trivial to explain such a simple question :p
BishopPatton
  • BishopPatton
Then why couldn't you have... even if you don't feel you need to others might need it explained to them.
BishopPatton
  • BishopPatton
And i agree lol :D
anonymous
  • anonymous
I typically explain my answers in detail. I apologize for not doing so this time.
BishopPatton
  • BishopPatton
@kylaray just probably wouldn't know the answer so it is better to teach her/him since she had to ask the answer.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Fair enough, they've already asked a similar question and I hadn't explained that time either. I suppose it's my fault that they couldn't answer this question themselves. I apologize and thank you for explaining it for Kylaray.
BishopPatton
  • BishopPatton
No... you are fine... i looked through your answers and it seems you explain yourself almost always.
Mr.Z
  • Mr.Z
That's all fine and good, but I'll tell you all what I told the other loyalist type OS users; sometimes a mundane, paper filled, random fact filled assignment is just busy work. Sure it's against CoC, but there's a difference between someone waning to learn and someone wanting to just slug through their work.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.