sbuck98
  • sbuck98
I need help on #26:( I will award a medal!
Geometry
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
sbuck98
  • sbuck98
1 Attachment
welshfella
  • welshfella
I'm not familiar with these 2 column proofs but basically because a || b the internal angles <1 and <4 , and <2 and <3 both add up to 180 degrees. So since we are given that <1 = <4 then <2 must be equal to <3.
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
|dw:1443390689054:dw|

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

zepdrix
  • zepdrix
|dw:1443390778808:dw|Always start with what is given :)
sbuck98
  • sbuck98
so you can step me through this? @zepdrix
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
Hmm I'm not sure what would be the fastest way to finish this... I like welsh's idea of using the fact that we have two pairs of supplementary angles and doing some business with that. But maybe we have some trapezoid rule we can use to shorten it :o
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
thinking
sbuck98
  • sbuck98
also are you familar with other things in geometry? need help with other problems
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
Let's just use welsh's idea :)
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
|dw:1443391104222:dw|This is the reasoning that I would give.
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
|dw:1443391195749:dw|by the same reasoning
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
Since <1 and <4 are the same, hmm <2 and <3 must be the same... Bahh I dunno >.< There's probably a better way to do these last few steps... grr
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
Grr I wish jim was online :P
sbuck98
  • sbuck98
lol help me with these then!
sbuck98
  • sbuck98
@zepdrix
zepdrix
  • zepdrix
\[\large\rm V=LWH\]Notice that L is being `multiplied` by W and H. How do we undo `multiplication`? What is the opposite of multiplication?
sbuck98
  • sbuck98
divide
sbuck98
  • sbuck98
@zepdrix
Nnesha
  • Nnesha
|dw:1443398514837:dw|
Nnesha
  • Nnesha
good website to practice https://www.mathsisfun.com/geometry/parallel-lines.html
Nnesha
  • Nnesha
scroll down a little where u see *choose one * ^^^`

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.