Linear Algebra.... Need help with #6 part III.... Please see attachment

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions.

A community for students.

Linear Algebra.... Need help with #6 part III.... Please see attachment

Mathematics
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

1 Attachment
the inner product is bilinear, so $$\langle a+b,c+d\rangle=\langle a+b,c\rangle+\langle a+b,d\rangle=\langle a,c\rangle +\langle b,c\rangle+\langle a,d\rangle+\langle b,d\rangle$$
I am about to upload what I have done... don;t know where to go from there

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

1 Attachment
so here we have $$\langle 2u+3v-w,u-v+w\rangle\\\quad =\langle 2u,u\rangle+\langle2u,-v\rangle+\langle 2u,w\rangle\\\qquad +\langle 3v,u\rangle+\langle3v,-v\rangle+\langle 3v,w\rangle\\\qquad+\langle -w,u\rangle+\langle-w,-v\rangle+\langle -w,w\rangle$$
now we're told that \(u,v,w\) are unit vectors, so \(\|u\|=\|v\|=\|w\|=1\) and we're also told that they're each separated from one another by an angle of \(\pi/4\) in space
I think your looking at the wrong problem.
I have that one finished
I am working on part III
remember we have that \(\langle x,x\rangle=\|x\|^2\) and more generally \(\langle x,y\rangle =\|x\|\|y\|\cos\theta\) where \(\theta\) is the angle between \(x,y\), so now evaluate all the inner products
oh, oops -- I misread the title and thought it said part II
Lol No big deal, could you look at my work?
I also eliminated all the inner products that were not of the same vector because they are orthogonal
\[\sqrt{++}\]
That is what I am left with but I don't know what to do with that because \[\sqrt{4}+\sqrt{2}\neq \sqrt{4+2}\]
for part III, consider we have $$\langle x,x\rangle=\|x\|^2$$so it follows that $$\|u+v+w\|^2=\langle u+v+w,u+v+w\rangle\\\quad=\langle u,u\rangle+\langle v,v\rangle+\langle w,w\rangle+2\langle u,v\rangle+2\langle u,w\rangle+2\langle v,w\rangle$$now since we said \(u,v,w\) are all mutually orthogonal it means those cross terms \(\langle u,v\rangle=\langle u,w\rangle=\langle v,w\rangle=0\) so: $$\|u+v+w\|^2=\|u\|^2+\|v\|^2+\|w\|^2\\\implies \|u+v+w\|\implies\sqrt{\|u\|^2+\|v\|^2+\|w\|^2}$$ indeed
So I can't just say that its the magnitude of one plus the magnitude of the other etc.
now \(\|u\|=\|v\|=2\) and \(\|w\|=3\) gives us $$\|u+v+w\|=\sqrt{2^2+2^2+3^2}=\sqrt{17}$$
I am confused
indeed, you can't (in general) say that the magnitude of the sum is the sum of the magnitudes
I am trying to explain my confusion but I am not as familiar with the equation tool as you are so give me one second and I will try to show you where I am confused
Real quick how do you create the brackets that go around the inner product?
\langle and \rangle
$$\text{\langle}\implies\langle\\\text{\rangle}\implies\rangle$$
\[\sqrt{++}\neq \sqrt{}+\sqrt{}+\sqrt{}\]
But in your explanation you made \[=\left| v \right|\]
indeed, that is not true
I meant for that absolute v to have double bars.....
yep, by definition \(\|v\|^2=\langle v,v\rangle\) so \(\langle u,u\rangle=2^2=4\), \(\langle v,v\rangle =2^2=4\) and \(\langle w,w\rangle=3^2=9\)
but the definition in my book shows that \[\left| \right|v \left| \right|=\sqrt{}\]
Oh I see it now, you took the square of both sides to arrive at what you had. I didn't make that connection. THank you

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question