At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I'm pretty sure this is the first or the 3rd one, I just want to be 100% sure and would appreciate explanations
Your are right. Those are the 2 best choices.
Newton's first law of motion is often stated as. An object at rest stays at rest and an object in motion stays in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.
If two individual forces are of equal magnitude and opposite direction, then the forces are said to be balanced
|dw:1443410685221:dw| You think its balanced or unbalanced?
unbalanced? wouldn't it be balanced if say one was in the -y direction and the other was in the positive y direction?
Yes, +y direction and -y direction of same magnitude are balanced. But this says positive y direction and negative direction with equal magnitude right?
yeah but one is in the x direction and one is in the y so would they still be balanced?
Read my explanation before the box diagram.
They are adjacent to each other, not opposite
thats basically what i just said
i'm so confused
Opposite force and equal magnitude=balanced You said it was balanced. The force acting on the box is not opposite to each other. (Refer to my diagram and question.)
i said it was unbalanced -_- i just need to know if this is effecting velocity or acceleration.
yeah but one is in the x direction and one is in the y so would they still be balanced? unbalanced? wouldn't it be balanced if say one was in the -y direction and the other was in the positive y direction?
2 quotes form you saying it is balanced.
Read the last sentence in Newton's First Law of Motion. Change in speed means there is an acceleration. No change in speed means no acceleration.
I never said ti was balanced you asked is it balanced or unbalanced i answered unbalanced? because if it was opposite it would be -y vs +y . you said correct that -y and +y would be balanced. and i asked would it still be considered balanced since one is up and one is to the left not down vs. up.....
Oh. Because most people that answers me just say the choices without explanation. I like how you didnt just say the choice. The way you phrased looks like it can have both meanings lol.
Did you read the law?