anonymous
  • anonymous
Which of the following best explains why secondary sources are important to historians? A. They summarize conclusions about primary sources. B. They are the least biased source available for any subject . C. They provide firsthand accounts of historical events. D. They put historical events in the correct chronological order. I think it is A.
History
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

anonymous
  • anonymous
A
anonymous
  • anonymous
Thank you, :)
anonymous
  • anonymous
Let me know if you need any other help :)

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
I will thanks again! :)

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.