At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I think my last two are wrong
I think that the foot length is the dependent variable, then it has to be written along the y-axis
ok so you agree with my first answer
yes! furthermore the horizontal scale isalong the x-axis, so the horizontal scale measures the height of a person, and then such horizontal scale runs from 60 to 70
vertical scale is correct!
DAng it, well I was close
I think that a \(linear\) relationship, between the two above variables, is expected
I see , well looking at it like that it was silly of me to put what I put
I didnt realize that it meant those two values
since, more is the height of a person and more has to be the length of his/her feet
first variable (independent variable) is the height of a person, whereas second variable (dependent variable) is the length of the foot of that person
Oh, because it already sya the foot length. Well im going with B, C, D, A Thank - you for your help!