Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

- anonymous

Medal! Question: Using the properties of exponents and radicals, design at least three different equivalent forms of x². You must show how each one can be simplified back to x² in two or more steps. Stretch your mind and get creative! Keep in mind that something too simple, like x • x would not be acceptable since it takes only one step to convert it to x².
So, I know how to solve these equations, but writing them confuses me, especially when they have to equal a certain thing. Help?

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions.

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions

- anonymous

- chestercat

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this

and **thousands** of other questions

- Directrix

Do you think that something like this would be acceptable?
|dw:1443847826793:dw|

- Directrix

Here are two ideas. ^^^ I don't know if they meet the requirements of the assignment.
The first one I wrote does not have more than two steps so it is not a proper answer.
The second one I wrote - do you think it is acceptable? @bryanodylan

- Directrix

@bryanodylan
Simplify this:
|dw:1443848777639:dw|

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.