In one hypothesis about the origin of life on Earth, scientists propose that organic molecules were produced from inorganic molecules in chemical reactions. How would you evaluate a scientist's claim that reactions, showing organic molecules emerging from inorganic molecules, can be seen in nature today?
The claim must be false because modernday evolution cant be observed and recorded
The claim is likely to be false because the current conditions on Earth are opposed to the formation of life.
The claim is likely to be true because all the elements necessary for the formation of or
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
@tennisplayer18 The claim is likely to be true because all the elements necessary for the formation of , For example: organic molecules on the planet Mars is now a ... life elsewhere in the universe would utilize cell structures like those found on Earth.