• anonymous
In one hypothesis about the origin of life on Earth, scientists propose that organic molecules were produced from inorganic molecules in chemical reactions. How would you evaluate a scientist's claim that reactions, showing organic molecules emerging from inorganic molecules, can be seen in nature today? The claim must be false because modernday evolution cant be observed and recorded The claim is likely to be false because the current conditions on Earth are opposed to the formation of life. The claim is likely to be true because all the elements necessary for the formation of or
  • Stacey Warren - Expert
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at in under 10 minutes. Go to now for free help!
  • Koikkara
@tennisplayer18 The claim is likely to be true because all the elements necessary for the formation of , For example: organic molecules on the planet Mars is now a ... life elsewhere in the universe would utilize cell structures like those found on Earth.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.