At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions.

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions

Can someone help me with this? Don't just give me the answer but i need the steps too cuz i don't understand it. Thanks :)

that one line seems to be missing +2(k+1)+6 on the left hand side

wait I'm confused

it is also missing a square on the (k+1)

lol, your giving out answers

I'm confused

Me?

what is the question? is it asking if the setup is correct?

I thought it was asking to use this to prove this

lol I didn't know I was giving answers

yep it is asking if it is correct

oops

then we would walk thru the process, to determine if the step they propose is valid.

as freckles pointed out already ... its missing alot of stuff tho

I guess it kind of does make sense as a true false question.

on both left and right hand sides of the equation

id say that replacement depends on the structure of the problem

right but there is also another thing missing on the left hand side

would the left side turn into 2k+8 or something?

I thought we were going to prove something. :(
And there was just a lot of type-o.

Its okay haha at least i understand it now. Thank you :)