Source 1 Over 150 years ago, Abraham Lincoln and Stephan A. Douglas held seven debates as they campaigned for a Senate seat in Illinois. The debates focused on the issue of slavery and its expansion into the territories. Douglas helped overturn the prohibition on slavery in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska with the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Referred to as popular sovereignty, citizens in Kansas and Nebraska, not the federal government, could determine whether slavery should be allowed to exist in these territories.

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions.

A community for students.

Source 1 Over 150 years ago, Abraham Lincoln and Stephan A. Douglas held seven debates as they campaigned for a Senate seat in Illinois. The debates focused on the issue of slavery and its expansion into the territories. Douglas helped overturn the prohibition on slavery in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska with the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Referred to as popular sovereignty, citizens in Kansas and Nebraska, not the federal government, could determine whether slavery should be allowed to exist in these territories.

History
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

Read the following passages. Each source is related to the 1858 debates between Stephen A. Douglas and Abraham Lincoln for a seat in the United States Senate. Which of the following describes a difference between Source 1 and Source 2?
Source 2 "That is the real issue [with the question of slavery]…It is the eternal struggle between these two principles-right and wrong-throughout the world. They are the two principles that have stood face to face from the beginning of time; and will ever continue to struggle. The one is the common right of humanity and the other the divine right of kings. It is the same principle in whatever shape it develops itself. It is the same spirit that says, ‘You work and toil and earn bread, and I'll eat it.’ No matter in what shape it comes, whether from the mouth of a king who seeks to bestride the people of his own nation and live by the fruit of their labor, or from one race of men as an apology for enslaving another race, it is the same tyrannical principle.” —Abraham Lincoln, during the seventh debate with Stephen A. Douglas
A. Source 1 is an example of bias, while Source 2 is an example of historiography. B. Source 1 is a secondary source, while Source 2 is a primary source. C. Source 1 is a primary source, while Source 2 is a secondary source. D. Source 1 is an example of historiography, while Source 2 is an example of bias.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

Hmm This is a Thinker... Hold on Let me reread them again before I decide
ok
C
ithink its A
ohhh ok
Here's The difference between Primary and Secondary Source, A primary source is a document or physical object which was written or created during the time under study. These sources were present during an experience or time period and offer an inside view of a particular event. A secondary source interprets and analyzes primary sources. These sources are one or more steps removed from the event. Secondary sources may have pictures, quotes or graphics of primary sources in them
ohh i see
If you were to apply chronological thinking to the Revolutionary War, which of the following would you most likely do? A. Argue that the war was more important than another war B. Recreate some of the war's most important battles C. Write an article about the war's long-term impact D. Create a timeline of major events in the war
are you going to be on tommorow morning?
Yeah most likely I will
what answe is this one ?
D makes the most sense
Which of the following is not a necessary part of the historical thinking process? A. Gathering information B. Asking questions C. Publishing articles D. Drawing conclusions
this the last one
B right
Ok Here's the Five core components of historical thinking help answer that question. They are: Multiple Accounts & Perspectives Analysis of Primary Documents Sourcing Understanding Historical Context Claim-Evidence Connection
b>?
Yeah B, makes the most sense
it was wrongg lol
Seriously?
ihad a 65% i needed at least a 70%
Which of the following describes what a historian is doing when she examines the ways different historical cultures studied and recorded history? A. Dividing history into periods B. Thinking chronologically C. Studying historiography D. Determining bias
i say C
Ok I am not so sure about this, I am reading about the Historians here to see which makes sense: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historian
Which of the following techniques developed after the invention of writing to organize information and keep people interested when reading a historical text? A. Historical narrative B. Oral history C. Periodization D. Historiography
C
Suppose you have read two different books on World War II, and each book has different arguments about how the war started. Which of the following would be most useful in evaluating each argument? A. Determine which author used the most reliable sources B. Determine which author wrote the longest book C. Determine which author used the most persuasive language D. Determine which author used more sources
Which do you think it is?
A
Yeah, because Reliable sources are needed in order to prove your argument as a fact.
A. Source 1 is a secondary source, while Source 2 is a primary source. B. Source 1 is an example of historiography, while Source 2 is an example of bias. C. Source 1 is an example of bias, while Source 2 is an example of historiography. D. Source 1 is a primary source, while Source 2 is a secondary source.
do you remember this one
Yeah I remember this question
?
Read the following passages. Each source is related to the 1858 debates between Stephen A. Douglas and Abraham Lincoln for a seat in the United States Senate. Which of the following describes a difference between Source 1 and Source 2?
I might go with C, which do you think?
the first one was D so idk ill go with tht
Ok do that then... But I'll brb I need to go buy me some lunch i'll be back in 15 mins if you don't mind?
ok

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question