RaquelKelli01
  • RaquelKelli01
Carlos says that the XYZ is not congruent to PQR because there is no SSA theorem or postulate. In two or more complete sentences, explain why or why not Carlos is correct. Justify your answer using triangle congruency postulates, theorems, and definitions.
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
RaquelKelli01
  • RaquelKelli01
mathstudent55
  • mathstudent55
If the figure is showing all pairs of corresponding sides that are congruent and all pairs of corresponding angles that are congruent, an no other pairs of sides or angles are congruent, then Carlos is correct. Using the given congruent angles X and P, the pair of congruent sides XY and PQ, and the pair of congruent sides YZ and QR, corresponding sides XZ and PR must be of different lengths, so the triangles are not congruent. On the other hand, if the figure shows some pairs of corresponding parts but not necessarily all, then Carlos is incorrect. Carlos stated that the triangles are not congruent. He is correct that there is no SSA theorem or postulate, so we do not have enough information to prove that the two triangles are congruent, but at the same time, we don't have information to prove they are not congruent. Since we have no information on another pair of sides or angles, we simply do not know if the triangles are congruent or not. We cannot conclude they are not congruent.
RaquelKelli01
  • RaquelKelli01
Thanks, I think I know how to answer this question now.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

mathstudent55
  • mathstudent55
You're welcome.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.