anonymous
  • anonymous
Which of the following best explains why secondary sources are important to historians? A. They put historical events in the correct chronological order. B. They are the least biased source available for any subject. C. They summarize conclusions about primary sources. D. They provide firsthand accounts of historical events.
History
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
It is not d
anonymous
  • anonymous
what do you think it is?
anonymous
  • anonymous
c?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
I think it is c too 90%
anonymous
  • anonymous
Actually I now think it is b
anonymous
  • anonymous
A primary source is if u have the declaration of independence or a replica of it. If a teacher told you about the declaration of Independence that would be a secondary source.
anonymous
  • anonymous
thanks
anonymous
  • anonymous
No problem anything else?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.