anonymous
  • anonymous
Question regarding cylinders and radial electric fields
Physics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
You understand that the recent increase in U.S. natural gas prices is expected to shunt demand for gas as utilities use more coal to generate power. Such utilities are interested in the use of electrostatic precipitators, which use electric forces to remove pollutant particles from smoke, in particular in the smokestacks of coal-burning power plants. One form of precipitator you are studying consists of a vertical, hollow, metal cylinder with a thin wire, insulated from the cylinder, running along its axis. A large potential difference is established between the wire and the outer cylinder, with the wire at lower potential. This sets up a strong radial electric field directed inward. The field produces a region of ionized air near the wire. Smoke enters the precipitator at the bottom, ash and dust in it pick up electrons, and the charged pollutants are accelerated toward the outer cylinder wall by the electric field. Suppose the radius of the central wire is 9.0 x 10–5 m, the radius of the cylinder is 0.14 m, and the potential difference of 5 x 104 V is established between the wire and the cylinder. Also assume that the wire and cylinder are both very long in comparison to the cylinder radius. You are asked: (a) What is the magnitude of the electric field midway between the wire and the cylinder wall? (b) What magnitude of charge must a 3.00 x 10–8 kg ash-particle have if the electric field computed in part (a) is to exert a force ten times the weight of the particle? @Mashy
anonymous
  • anonymous
@Mashy Now, there are two approaches that I have found in my research. One claims that the field is uniform and radial, therefore the problem can be solved using \[V_2-V_1=-\int\limits E dr\] However, another claim is that the field is not uniform. How should I approach this?
anonymous
  • anonymous
your questions are very nicely worded :P .. What grade questions are these? Clearly radial cylindrical fields are non uniform.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
They are university-engineering level :) And that would make sense because at the longer ends, the field should be weaker.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Okay.. you should know the expression for the cylindrical field \[E = \frac{\lambda}{2 \pi \epsilon_0 R}\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
Okay and so \[\lambda=\frac{Q}{L}\] right? But is it the length of the whole cylinder?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Since it is infinitely long (very long) its better to keep the answer in lamda itself. Now our job is to calculate lambda.. We have the knowledge of potential difference. so you can do the integral.. plug in the values of V2, V1, and calculate Lambda
anonymous
  • anonymous
How would I go about setting up this integral? \[\lambda=\int\limits \frac{ E }{ 2\pi \epsilon_0R }dR\]?
anonymous
  • anonymous
you already did.. now integrate it from R1 (the radius of the wire) to R2 (radius of the pipe)
anonymous
  • anonymous
\[\lambda=\frac{ E }{ 2\pi \epsilon_0 }\ln(\frac{ R_2 }{ R_1 }) \]
anonymous
  • anonymous
Wait.. I overlooked.. why is there an E? :P It should be lamda
anonymous
  • anonymous
I solved for lambda in the first equation you gave me and then integrated with respect to R >_< lol
anonymous
  • anonymous
Wait, I'm not actually sure what I did.. lol
anonymous
  • anonymous
I think I accidentally swapped the variables. It should be E = lambda and the rest
anonymous
  • anonymous
yes.. just swap E and Lamda and you should be fine!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Sweet. And for the second part it's jsut F=qE? F=mg, so mg=qE and just solve for q?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Well 10mg since it says the F is 10 times the weight
anonymous
  • anonymous
10 times the weight
anonymous
  • anonymous
yea yea.. correct
anonymous
  • anonymous
you are all set on reducing pollution.. (Well theoretically :P)
anonymous
  • anonymous
Thank you! Do you have time for one more problem? I think it should be simple but I'm stuck (probably because it's in the wee hours of the evening :P)
anonymous
  • anonymous
ok shoot.. lets do one more before I go for lunch
anonymous
  • anonymous
@Mashy Actually, I just realized that my problem contains actual constants, so I think I'm suppose to have a numerical answer rather than an expression. I don't know lambda. They've also given me the potential difference..

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.