Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.
h(t)=-16t2+vt+h is the vertical motion formula
−7(.8²)+11(.8)+4 = 8.32
−7(.7²)+11(.7)+4 = 8.27, seems less accurate. I'd go with the third option
He needs to understand how to use it.. :/
I hate how I get warning for giving out answers while others don't
Oh, sorry, didn't know you're not just supposed to answer.
Why do you tink you know whether or not someone else receives a warning? It's not public knowledge.
You should use the formulation provided by Gabe, but you should first notice that the problem is in meters. Thus, the formula provided by Gabe will not quite be suitable. Change that leading coefficient. This error can be quite expensive: http://articles.latimes.com/1999/oct/01/news/mn-17288