shaniehh
  • shaniehh
Help me solve this ASAP
Algebra
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
shaniehh
  • shaniehh
GabeBae
  • GabeBae
Do you know how to use h(t)=-16t2+vt+h?
shaniehh
  • shaniehh
not really

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

GabeBae
  • GabeBae
h(t)=-16t2+vt+h is the vertical motion formula
anonymous
  • anonymous
−7(.8²)+11(.8)+4 = 8.32 −7(.7²)+11(.7)+4 = 8.27, seems less accurate. I'd go with the third option
GabeBae
  • GabeBae
He needs to understand how to use it.. :/ I hate how I get warning for giving out answers while others don't
anonymous
  • anonymous
Oh, sorry, didn't know you're not just supposed to answer.
GabeBae
  • GabeBae
That's fine...
tkhunny
  • tkhunny
Why do you tink you know whether or not someone else receives a warning? It's not public knowledge.
tkhunny
  • tkhunny
You should use the formulation provided by Gabe, but you should first notice that the problem is in meters. Thus, the formula provided by Gabe will not quite be suitable. Change that leading coefficient. This error can be quite expensive: http://articles.latimes.com/1999/oct/01/news/mn-17288

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.