At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I posted the question, and then the choices. Please help me!
@atreyu6s3x6 Help please?
Hey, @Ms-Brains, do you happen to have any idea of what the answer might be?
Nope. I never learned this either. My teacher just gave us these questions, and didn't cover them in class at all.
ello love :) haha whats up?
Hi! I posted a new question, cx Let me tag you in that one!
I completely understand where you're coming from about the teachers giving you work that they never explained. However, for this problem, you will organize the numbers from smallest to largest, therefore you would get: 50, 55, 55, 65, 65, 75, 75, 80, 80 85, 90, 90, 90, 90, 95 So, begin by writing the numbers out on a graph, and placing a dot for each number you have. Your answer should be the following graph, aka B. |dw:1446662108051:dw|
So D is the answer..?
I'm so confused. Is it D, or A. I honestly have no clue
Since they gave you the numbers: 90, 55, 85, 65, 50, 75, 55, 95, 90, 65, 80, 90, 75, 80, 90 You would reorder them from greatest to largest which would be: 50, 55, 55, 65, 65, 75, 75, 80, 80, 85, 90, 90, 90, 90, 95 Now, after that, you would go ahead and apply those numbers to the graph. The answer would be B because that's the only graph that every single number lines up correctly.
Oh my god! Thanks so much @JacobChaotic You're the bomb man!
Anytime @Ms-Brains! Do you see where I got the answer however? I can try to explain differently.
No, no, I'm good. I understand. :)