Which answer correctly describes the Federalists' position on the need for a Bill of Rights in the Constitution?
The Bill of Rights was needed to unify the states against Europe.
The Bill of Rights was only needed to ensure ratification by the states.
The Bill of Rights could override the Constitution in emergencies.
The Bill of Rights was not needed if a strong central government was in place.
Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
the answer is the last one.... The Federalists felt that this addition wasn't necessary, because they believed that the Constitution as it stood only limited the government not the people. This is from: https://www.constitutionfacts.com/us-articles-of-confederation/the-great-debate/