Sushi121212
  • Sushi121212
Could you help me on geometric proofs?
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
Sushi121212
  • Sushi121212
nikato
  • nikato
the first statement should always be what you are given. and the reason will be given
nikato
  • nikato
for 2, hint: what do you know about angle WOX and ZOY

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

Sushi121212
  • Sushi121212
They're congruent?
nikato
  • nikato
yes. and why?
Sushi121212
  • Sushi121212
Because the sides are congruent?
nikato
  • nikato
no. have you heard of the vertical angle theorem
Sushi121212
  • Sushi121212
Yes, is it where if one angle is on the opposite side of another one, then it has the same measure?
Sushi121212
  • Sushi121212
So is it ∠O ≅ ∠O?
Directrix
  • Directrix
Proof One: |dw:1447287725248:dw|
Directrix
  • Directrix
I'll do the statements and you the reasons: 1) Seg WO is congruent to Seg ZO 1. Seg XO is congruent to Seg YO 2) < WOX is congruent to < ZOY 2. 3) Tri WOX is congruent to Tri ZOY 3. @Sushi121212
Sushi121212
  • Sushi121212
1. Given 2. Def. of congruent triangles? 3. Side Angle Side
Directrix
  • Directrix
Given is correct for #1. 2. Def. of congruent triangles? is wrong. The statement talks about congruent angles so your reason should be about those two angles - the kinds of angles they are and the relationship between them. 3. Should be one of the triangle congruence postulates. Look at the attachment to decide which one it is. @Sushi121212
Sushi121212
  • Sushi121212
So is #2 the vertical angle property? Is #3 SAS?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.