Which statement accurately contrasts the Ottoman and Safavid empires in the 16th century?
A. Safavid rulers were Muslims who persecuted Hindus living within the empire, whereas Ottoman rulers practiced Sikhism, which shares some beliefs with both Hinduism and Islam.
B. Safavid rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his close friend Abu Bakr, whereas Ottoman rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his son-in-law Ali.
C. Ottoman rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his close friend Abu Bakr, whereas Safavid rulers believed that Muhammad's successor was his son-in-law
Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
D. Ottoman rulers were Muslims who persecuted Hindus living within the empire, whereas Safavid rulers practiced Sikhism, which shares some beliefs with both Hinduism and Islam.
Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.
okay, thank you so much
Which of these achievements was crucial to the Ottoman Turks' ability to capture Byzantine cities in the 15th century?
A. Their mastery of gunpowder
B. Their democratic form of government
C. Their control of trade routes
D. Their religious tolerance
do you know this one ? by chance
hey why this question is closed??
I am not sure ):
let me see if i can help :P
that would be awesome !!
i belive it's a gun powder :)
You are awesome
i have two more if you wanna help(:
What was the relationship between Western Europe, East Asia, and the Ottoman Empire in the 16th century?
A. European kings and Ottoman sultans defended one another from East Asian emperors.
B. East Asian Muslims and Ottoman Muslims cooperated to convert European Christians.
C. The Ottomans grew wealthy by taxing trade between Europe and East Asia.
D. Armies from Europe and East Asia conquered large chunks of territory from the Ottomans.
Ottomans=Asia Minor, eastern Europe. Safavids=Persia, Hindus=India.
Ottomans and Safavids are both Moslem, Hindus are, well, Hindu. None of them lived in Turkey or Iran. (Asia Minor and Persia) Any choice mentioning Hindus with Ottomans or Safavids is wrong.
The Safavids were Sufi. Among other things they are different from other Muslems because they back the brother-in-law cousin of Mohammed not his friend. Ottomans are vice-versa.
The Ottoman empire took control of trade routes after the Mongols. No more free trips on the Silk Road for Europe and the Byzantines. The Ottomans charged Europeans to get to China and other east Asia places.
You didn't ask but, Europeans started being interested in sailing around Africa to avoid Ottomans taxes. And then, Columbus.