anonymous
  • anonymous
Write an essay of at least two to three paragraphs analyzing this newspaper remark from the Richmond Examiner. Use specific quotations from the Gettysburg Address to support or refute the newspaper’s claim. I need help analyzing what the statements mean!
English
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
The Gettysburg Address "Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field as a final resting-place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. But in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead who struggled here have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living rather to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain, that this nation under God shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth." From the Richmond Examiner "Kings are usually made to speak in the magniloquent language supposed to be suited to their elevated position. On the present occasion, Lincoln acted the clown."
anonymous
  • anonymous
I understand that Kings are supposed to speak in a way that lets you know they are definitely king and not just a common fellow, but I don't quite understand how I'm supposed to prove that Lincoln has not proven himself to be worthy of leadership. To me he is quite well spoken and he uses great vocabulary. Am I missing something?
anonymous
  • anonymous
As far as the clown statement goes, I don't see how Lincoln acted a "clown", meaning silly I presume. I think he was formal. His wording implied this to me. Again am I missing something?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
This has helped me: magniloquent (adj) (outdated and rarely used) pompous. A magniloquent speech is a speech in a pompous language. Magniloquent style makes use of bombast. High sounding words and lengthy sentences mark a magniloquent piece of writing or speech. The author thought that his magniloquent language would impress his readers. Instead, the pompous style tired them and turned them away from the book. The magniloquent speech of the politician made him the laughing stock of the audiences. His bombast tired the audiences who left the place in the middle of the speech.
anonymous
  • anonymous
So, perhaps if Lincoln were to speak in a "magniloquent" manner, then his audience might get lost and spend their time deciphering what Lincoln's saying rather than paying attention to what he's talking about in his speech, which is the whole point. Does this make sense, or is it just me? Also, he might sound too wordy and lengthy, which also might take away from the meaning of his speech and the interest of the audience.
anonymous
  • anonymous
For example, a person of a higher position and/or a higher education, like, a King, I guess, might use this sentence: Please, I implore you! Do be so kind as to assist me with my long procrastinated drudgery. Whereas a more "common" person would say: Help me with my homework please! So thank you, me, I think I've got it from here! I know what I'm going to write for my assignment.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I wish I could give myself a medal so bad!
anonymous
  • anonymous
XD So u did figure it out?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yes I did!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Okay lol nvm den XD

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.