anonymous
  • anonymous
Medal+Fan For answering my questions
History
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
micahm
  • micahm
have you tryed googling you question before????
anonymous
  • anonymous
no

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

micahm
  • micahm
it would be better the screen shoot ing it
anonymous
  • anonymous
Which of these pieces of evidence would be most important for jurors to consider in the case of Snoozer v. Early? Dibeast has lunch every week with Ms. Snoozer and trains her birds. Dibeast saw the birds on Early’s property the day the birds went missing. Dibeast is an animal control officer who often has to capture Ms. Snoozer’s birds. Dibeast witnessed that Early’s cat was trained and well behaved.
anonymous
  • anonymous
1. The case is in the jury selection phase, and the trial will follow. 2. Dibeast saw the birds on Early’s property the day the birds went missing.
anonymous
  • anonymous
John and Bob are going to court. John says Bob failed to pay him for a racing bike, while Bob says John gave it to him as a gift. What type of case is this and what are the possible verdicts? This is a criminal case. The jury can rule that Bob is liable or not liable. This is a civil case. The jury can rule that Bob is liable or not liable. This is a civil case. The jury can rule that Bob is guilty or not guilty. This is a criminal case. The jury can rule that Bob is guilty or not guilty.
anonymous
  • anonymous
@BraceFacee
anonymous
  • anonymous
This is a civil case. The jury can rule that Bob is liable or not liable.
anonymous
  • anonymous
In the lesson, you played the role of a juror in the case of State v. Justin B. Goode. What type of case was it, and what could be its outcome? It was a civil case. Runnuh Bizz was seeking compensation from Goode for the robbery of her video game store. It was a criminal case. Justin B. Goode faced possible jail time for spray-painting government buildings in the city. It was a civil case. Runnuh Bizz was seeking compensation from Goode for repainting several buildings in the city. It was a criminal case. Justin B. Goode faced possible jail time for accusations that he robbed a video game store.
anonymous
  • anonymous
@BraceFacee
anonymous
  • anonymous
@BraceFacee
anonymous
  • anonymous
It was a criminal case. Justin B. Goode faced possible jail time for accusations that he robbed a video game store.
anonymous
  • anonymous
In the lesson, you played the role of a juror in the case of Snoozer v. Early. Who was the plaintiff in that case? Suzy Snoozer, who wants compensation for her missing birds Felina Early, who is accused of not controlling her cat Johnny B. Goode, who is accused of robbing a video game store Runnuh Bizz, who wants compensation for the stolen goods
anonymous
  • anonymous
Suzy Snoozer, who wants compensation for her missing birds
anonymous
  • anonymous
In the lesson, you played the role of a juror in the case of State v. Justin B. Goode. In that case, when the defense attorney cross-examined Suss Pihshawn, his goal was to question the police officer and challenge the evidence against Mr. Goode question the police officer and challenge the evidence against the state meet with Suss Pihshawn to discuss strategy without the jury around meet with Suss Pihshawn to discuss what verdict he will recommend
anonymous
  • anonymous
I think- question the police officer and challenge the evidence against Mr. Goode
anonymous
  • anonymous
Which of the following makes a true statement about the case of State v. Justin B. Goode ? The defendant plead guilty to the charges at his arraignment. The teacher testified that Goode would not break the law. The police officer could not find any evidence against Goode. The neighbor said that Goode sold him stolen video games.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I'm not sure but I think between C & D.
anonymous
  • anonymous
In the lesson, you played the role of a juror in the case of Snoozer v. Early. What type of case was it, and what could be its outcome? It was a criminal case. Felina Early faced possible jail time for failing to control her cat. It was a civil case. Snoozer was seeking compensation for the loss of her birds. It was a civil case. Early was seeking compensation for the loss of her cat. It was a criminal case. Snoozer faced possible jail time for lying about her neighbor.
anonymous
  • anonymous
@BraceFacee
anonymous
  • anonymous
It was a civil case. Snoozer was seeking compensation for the loss of her birds.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.