anonymous
  • anonymous
12 Angry men questions 1. Did any of the jurors voting guilty at the outset of the film have a valid argument for the defendant's guilt? What was the argument and why was it valid? What made the juror change his mind? Did you believe the change was valid? 2. Is justice served in 12 Angry Men? Did a guilty man walk free? Was Juror 8 correct?
History
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
3. The conditions under which the jurors deliberated were very inhospitable. Consider how things might have been different had the men been seated in comfortable armchairs in a large, well-cooled, soothingly decorated room; also consider parallels between how circumstances provoked the jurors and how circumstances might have provoked the defendant in the case they were debating. 4. Setting aside the issue of diversity - a jury in 2010 is unlikely to be all white and all male - do you think this group of characters, with their assorted personalities and prejudices, is representative of a typical jury today? Why or why not?
anonymous
  • anonymous
5. Some of the posters that were used to advertise the 1957 film contained the following headline: "Life is in Their Hands-Death is on Their Minds! It Explodes like 12 Sticks of Dynamite!" Do you think that this was an accurate advertisement for the film? In what way? If not, in what way is it misleading or inaccurate? 6. What do you think is the directors’ view of the adversarial system of justice used in the United States? Does he believe, like one juror member in the film that in a democracy justice should be left to the hands of its citizens to decide? Or, does he think the system is corrupt, ineffective, and unjust? Give examples to support your reasoning.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.